Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Page Properties
label

Status

Status
colourYellow
titleIN PROGRESS

Scope

IMPLEMENTATION

Description

Decide how to handle WorldCat scope. Harmonize? If so, how?

Decision

See below

Owning group

Discovery FG Josephine Tan and Jess Waggoner, co-chairs

Approver

n/a

Stakeholders

R = Discovery FG
A = Discovery FG
C = SILS WG, Resource Management FG, Fulfillment & ILL FG
I = Cohort, All staff (SILS News)

Decision-making process

Review

CONSULT:

  • Local

RECOMMEND: Discovery FG will recommend

Priority

Mandatory before Go-live

Due date

TBD

...

  • User needs. How much will our researchers appreciate the ability to start an ILL directly from the Primo interface?

  • Common use scenarios. How do our researchers use WorldCat searching, and how well are they supported by including a separate WorldCat scope or including WorldCat records in a blended search?

    • Example scenario: WorldCat (on campuses that do not use WC Discovery) is used frequently by more advanced researchers looking for a known item that’s not available on their campus. So, for example, a search for older, more unique monographs.

  • Quality of WorldCat-only search . Primo’s search functions for WorldCat data are significantly worse than WorldCat for precision searches. (Other libraries, e.g. Northwestern, have handled this by providing a link to WorldCat instead of using Primo.)

    • No facets display in Primo.

    • No fielded searches in Primo, e.g. in WorldCat you can search ti:[title term] au:[author name].

  • Quality of blended search. How well does it work?

...