DISCOVERY VISION: We strive to design and implement the best possible discovery and delivery experience for our end users using data-driven decision making. We envision a network zone experience that will allow users to discover library materials across UC collections without sacrificing relevant results. As such, the default search and results interface should prioritize the success of typical users while providing additional functionality for more advanced users.
Wordmark/Logo; Up to DFG to use the new wordmark in testing sites
Josephine taking screenshots of where CSU campuses have placed their “OneSearch” wordmark/logo.
Some milestones, e.g., FRBR & Dedup might need to work with others on various campuses if ourside one’s area of expertise.
Is there more testing beyond Functionality testing such as Configuration testing; Ask ExLibris and discuss with other campuses;
Who will be using the list of MARC fields recommendations and a need for harmonization? Which fields are indexed and/or faceted? e.g, “publisher” is not a defult indexed search field and not a default faceted field
Sharon mentioned adding the following for her and Lisa’s list of MARC fields: - Enable field for search - Enable field for facet - Use Translations - Use the parallel Local Field 01/50 from the Dublin Core record - Use full test links for indexing
Make decision on naming UC-eLinks as soon as possible since there are so many places it would need to be updated.
We all have different roles; some more than others. Beginning Your Research Journey
Make recommendations regarding renaming UC-eLinks asap.
Develop list of extra recommendations
WorldCat to be added to Week 4 (3/22-3/26) - 3 different options to be tested at 3 groups of campuses. Need to create a sheet to document which campus will test which WorldCat option.
6
Configuration Recommendations Workbook
Decide which recommendations are ready for sign off