...
Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Local group takeaways | Actions | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Updates (please add in advance) | 10 mins | All | Liz:
Jean, UCB: It would be good to know more about cat stats if we could. Jean: Updated: Oh, I think this is a campus decision after all. Never mind. From earlier: A big issue that I am currently looking in our documents about, but I’ll put here in the case that I don’t find it soon: The non-migration of unlinked analytics. From my local UCB people: “It is unacceptable to not migrate them (at least not all of them). For Bancroft, they would like to propose that all "ze" locations be reverted back to "tb" and be migrated to Alma. There are some other ideas we have been kicking around for post-migration cleanup of these records. But, leaving them behind is not an option.” | ||||
2 | Reminder about campus SCP bibs | 5 mins | Please remind your local groups about this decision page regarding campus SCP bibs: (Vanguard and Test Load) Preparation of Campus SCP Data Campuses should only bring SCP records over for cutover/go-live if:
ILSDC also discussed issue for Alma campuses with SCP record, any update?
UCSD and UCLA had issues with the P2E process on 856 fields |
| ||||
3 | OCLC/Alma IZ document for Internal training group | Review google doc, identify any gaps | 10 mins | Test workflows during study hall on 3/10 to prep for 3/22 special meeting? Here’s the document Issues:
How to structure that meeting? | RMFG will finalize the document by 3/9 and share it with local SILS groups; ask for questions to be submitted by 3/15, to prep for 3/22 meeting | |||
4 | ETDs | Review google sheet and questions from TSELG | 20 mins | Can we standardize ETD records prior to migration or should we ask TSELG to let us revisit after go-live?
| Liz will make a Platonic ideal record and ask ProQuest/Merritt about what they can do | |||
5 | Testing documentation | 15 mins | Some test templates have been added to our tracking sheet, let’s review those and make sure we have data migration decisions identified All of the data decisions also have a new section called “decision of last resort” that we can use to make sure we don’t get stuck. Next week, 3/9, is voting meeting for 2 of these decisions: Aeon integration and Local fields
|
| ||||
6 | Subgroup sign-up! | 15 mins | We need subgroups for the following (so far):
| RMFG members sign up for any we’re interested in |
...