Page Comparison

Update and checking

Discuss questions and upcoming milestones

20 mins

Marcive:

Final cost-share

below are the notes from Marcive which I shared with the group last Oct:

Each library is going to have to reach out to Charity Fleming at Charityf@marcive.com to cancel their subscription.  She will work on providing pro-rated quotes for the libraries whose subscription ends before June 30^th, and credits for the libraries who have renewed and their subscription runs past June 30^th 2021.  Here is info for each library:

a. Davis will need a shortened subscription. 

b.  Santa Barbara will also need a shortened subscription period, but their sub expires December 2020.

c.  Los Angeles, Riverside, Santa Cruz and San Diego all have subscriptions that expire June 30, 2021, so they just need to not renew their subscriptions when they receive a notice. They would just mark cancel on the form. They can also cancel now with Charity to avoid confusion with their purchasing office in the future.

d. Berkeley can choose to ask for a prorated output for one month as their subscription expires May 2021. Or they can cancel like the others.

e. Irvine and Merced can cancel and receive a credit or refund as their subscriptions run past the July 2021 date. 

f. Santa Cruz has a different subscription than the other libraries.  They subscribe to the Enhanced GPO Database Service which also provides records for print and other tangible items.  Their subscription also expires June 2021. They may want to continue that subscription for those records, but adjust their FDLP profile to remove electronic records as they would be receiving those with this merged account.

GOBI:

Final cost share

Everyone will get Gold-level (fully cataloged) records

Each campus needs to work with GOBI to set up the process

Might want to wait until AEFG and RMFG have made their recommendations for processing these records/orders

Do anyone know who the payment works?

Everyone: see notes and let your campus know what needs to happen with regard to your MARCIVE subscription

CRL catalog

Questions

1. Do you support continuing to provide access to CRL content in the main UC discovery tool?

2. Does the strategy likely to be needed for accomplishing this seem sound to you?

3. Do you have any concerns about the effort?

4. Are there other stakeholders to consult about this?

5. Do you want to endorse this CRL content proposal and refer it to RMFG to figure out the details of making it happen?

30 mins

John

CDI Collection List: CRL catalog is on the list

The problem other EXL libraries have experienced: https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308173-alma/suggestions/41644846-add-ability-to-prevent-cdi-content-from-appearing

ARL libraries pay to have CRL holdings available/discoverable (via OCLC holdings symbol). We did this with Melvyl before, should we do it again in Alma?

• Yes!

CDI: it’s possible that the CRL CDI will be in Primo by default. It does look like the number of titles in the CDI collection sounds right.

Should consult with other group(s) in the future to understand CDI more fully

Is search ok, do the records need to actually be brought into the NZ?

• Goal is to get them into Primo, not necessarily in NZ

Any concerns for fulfillment/ILL?

• Should try to explore lending for users

What about PSELG?

What services does CRL provide its members and can those be served by records that only live in Primo?

• Access to holdings, including borrowing

• Digitization projects

• Shared collection development

How many UCs are CRL members?

• Everyone except UCI and UCR

• Should we check on a possible shared membership?

  • SCLG can bring it, no need for it to come from TSELG

Xiaoli and John will draft questions for PPC

JoAnne will check to see how UCB currently accesses CRL content

John will locate some current Melvyl titles and compare against current Primo

SCLG members will ask about a shared membership

Homework

Parking lot

Total

60/60