| Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions |
---|
1 | Start recording! | Welcome! | 0 | All | | | |
2 | Quick announcements | | 1 | | | | |
3 | SILS co-chairs update | Welcome guests, SGTF | 1 | Chris | |
|
|
4 | Timeline review (recurring) Reminder: Implementation Timeline on Confluence for staff without access to Basecamp. | Awareness of what’s happening / coming soon in the project | 0 | Lena, Christine | Upcoming Ex Libris meetings: | | |
5 | Shared Governance Task Force (SGTF) | All 4 documents are available here Overview and potential questions for your consideration Ongoing, UCLAS-Integrated SILS Organizational Structure UCLAS-Integrated SILS Structure: Roles and Responsibilities for teams Discussion Document: Phase 4 End Date, Transition and Ongoing Cohort Size
SGTF seeks SILS Chairs feedback on the UCLAS-integrated SILS structure and discussion document. SGTF also asks that the SILS Chairs consider the following questions in advance: To accomplish the initial, post-implementation decisions and standardization, is 5 months post-go-live appropriate for the phase 4 end date? (In other words, phase 4 will extend until the end of December 2021 -- see discussion document for strawperson proposals). We know you’re in the thick of loading and planning for implementation, but imagine yourselves about 5 months after go-live (December 2021): What discussions/decisions will still require a representative model for operations subteams? Can you foresee a roadmap, where operations subteams transition to being expertise based? E.g. 6 members with set term lengths, rotating through partners to ensure all campuses are represented over time, and consultation responsibilities --- akin to the phase 3 expertise groups.
It will be desirable to have continuity between phase 4 and the ongoing structure; do you agree that at least half of the members in the ongoing structure should be former phase 4 members? The timeline for accomplishing work in the ongoing, UCLAS-integrated structure should be considered. We do not (and likely cannot) continue to work on SILS at the same intensity. What do you think about this? Do you have any feedback specific to the ongoing SILS structure and roles?
| 50 | Ginny, Aislinn | | | |
6 | Communication Operation Leads update (recurring) | Awareness of communications activities. | 0 | Ben, Adrian | | | |
7 | Flagging any significant issues (recurring) | | 0 | | | | |
8 | Parking Lot Feel free to add a topic to the Proposed agenda topics page on Confluence | Capture important topics for future discussion | | | | | |
9 | | Total | 50/50 | | | | |