...
Item | Desired Outcome | Time (mn) | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Welcome | Catch-up and gather together | 3 | all | |||
| 2 | Announcements | Inform | 2 | all | PPC approved | ||
| 3 | CDI. Question 3. FullyFlexible or EasyActive | List of concern “themes” or specifics to share with ExL | 25 | all | Framework for discussion Before our next meeting, please
Heads up - I’ll be presenting our findings at Chairs meeting on Wednesday, May 5th. | Will OA content be automatically turned on in Easy Active? Our assumption is that Easy Active is for our licensed content only. Will Easy Active allow campuses to deactivate items? Our understanding is that we cannot deactivate items though comments from some campuses indicate that others believe that we can turn off items. Thread 1: Easy Active will still require work but perhaps a different kind of work. Thread 2: It can be difficult to make a decision. We may still feel like we don’t have enough information for a decision. Will our experience be similar to the implementation experience of other consortia? | Prepare summary document of Fully Flexible / Easy Active concerns for SILS Chairs meeting on Wednesday. Include questions to be clarified. (Beth) |
| 4 | CDI. Question 4. Feedback from consortia | 5 | See Rikke’s email for update. Note: The PMs started a sheet to gather responses from other consotia. It’s in the PPC “CDI testing” folder. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DRwdlXSTd8I_IGox4fj4DwbKjcxqUFsB3h8FRIN80VY/edit#gid=0 | Some consortia favored Fully Flexible since they were trying to accommodate diverse institutions with different user needs. | |||
| 5 | Standing item: As campuses start deeper discussions about SILS, can/should questions come to PSELG as information-sharing. | Support learning & transparency. These discussions will help inform members of PSELG re: decisions made by the functional groups. | 15 | all | Document for reference: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lhjZILResvHFpZp11wgJk2Ac74HxD4U3Qo3JIyRMBO4/edit?usp=sharing For discussion: Review reference CKG thread; identify concerns and communication needs. How would concerns map to the new structure; SILS or DOC? | No action. Current recommendation is that CKG members contact their functional group representative if they have questions related to SILS. DOC will be considering how to communicate with CKGs as the upcoming Phrase 5 governance structure is implemented. | |
| 6 | Wrap-up and next steps | Review actions and assignments | 5 | DS, BC | |||
| 7 | Parking Lot | Capture important topics for future discussion | |||||
| 8 | Total | 55 |
...