Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

record meeting

make sure Alison records meeting

1

Alison



2

Update from “which hybrid model” lightening team

  • Definitely ruled out direct FN (too much impact on patron workflow)

  • Next project: configuring P2P (assumption? high priority b/c reduces things falling out of AFN)

    • needs another partner for configuring & testing (either non-sb Tipasa (M or SF), or would limit Alma/Tipasa testing for piloter); NZ involvement not recommended b/c of simultaneous different test in different IZs (some investigation on configuration started)

    • Getting ExL’s help/assistance/guidance with configuring

    • Timeline? What coord with Tipasa golive? start now? how much effort? how often?

25

Sabrina, Mallory, Alison

3

what needs do we have for tipasa patron interface (what is “My ILL Requests” being used for now)

Get a set of hypothetical use cases for potentially utilizing (or decommissioning use of) separate extra-consortial requests UI

15

All

4

5

6

Wrap up

Review actions and decisions

5

7

Bike Rack

Capture important topics for future discussion

‘pu anywhere exceptions’: review shared messages, what would be next steps
metrics on how often ‘pu anywhere’ requests have to be changed to home campus (Jason) → may lead to: editing pu loc for this requests → may lead to: harmonizing bookbands

is the “randomized” part of the rota building actually randomizing things? Jason has a hunch that within the geographical groups it’s creating them alphabetically. (discovered in reviewing schedule c report)

NRLF/SRLF rejected stuck at B/LA follow up: SH’s ‘guide’; test with what B/LA see; more escalation with ExL (scott, Mallory, Jason, patrick)

ExL’s solicitation to “contribute to the Resource Sharing Directory”. Kind of a huge thing that we should think about? (Mallory) → maybe after P2P investigation…

8

Total

x/x

...