Stakeholder group | Impact |
|---|
DISC | Campus representatives can provide feedback and recommendations for treatment for individual collections. Consider impact of campus search scope and CDI Can provide feedback on what information about the collections to convey to end-users.
|
ERES | |
SCP -AC+ CDL staff | SCP staff are responsible creating and maintaining the collection-level bibliographic records. Concern that Alma collection descriptive records are not acceptable for discovery, and work around might be necessary to create a general/parent/umbrella bibliographic record that would stand in for the combined individual modules. CDL will continue to set up collection level records on multipart collections for the time being, as CDL determines what seems best for any given collection. If anything develops later with a SILS team or group’s decisions about procedures or best practices that causes us to change our workflows, CDL will review it then.
|
User Experience | Given Tier 1, 2 and 3 acquisitions models, e-collection records will have a different outcome, have varying models based on vendor, interactivity of records between IZ and NZ content, and other factors such as search scopes set up in Primo. |
CKGs, Instruction and reference services | Campuses can use and coordinate data for multiple tools, such as LibGuides A-Z Database List or Primo Database search, so combined metadata management output affects ability and consistency in achieving reference and instructional goals |