Page Comparison

(STANDING ITEM)

Subteam Roundup

Check-in on OSTs - capture any shared issues or cross-team task

5

Team

RM-OST:

• Published policy document:Campus Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETD) Metadata Practices

• Altered WorldCat Daily Updates procedure to add “new” and “merges” files.

• Coming up next: starting on a proposal to expand NZ access; will loop in other stakeholder groups.

Questions from Slack

FYI on anything quick that came up

5

Team

eRes: Kanopy videos can’t be managed in the NZ (videos) that we all have to manage separately. Can we nudge these vendors to make a CZ collection and have them do it for us?

When do we want to have an “advocacy” session in ACH

OT / LG updates

5

Jackie

Signature Success Program

Discussion and next steps for how to work strategically with Ex Libris

15

Caitlin

Google Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-xayW3AtXd7EjylhM6ty3w9qbEigDsJFZINBFUnKPUs/edit

• Are there any topics that are things that came from the RFP?

• Are we prioritizing workflow efficiency or patron experience?

  • SILS Principle says patron: in which case Discovery and CDI stuff will be high

  • Also eRES stuff impacts that.

• Lack of functionality between IZ/NZ

• Lack of documentation

• RM: talking about how the system works but that doesn’t work for us. We’re looking for things that are intrinsic to the design. → a lot of that stems from focusing on an IZ setup.

• Can we divide these beeves into “doable by ExLibiris” and “really more in our camp”

• What is the efficiency that we gain from having the NZ/IZ setup?

  • What would it cost if we were all on IZs on our own? with no NZ? And CDL operators can see into the IZs?

• We associate strategic thinking and RFP/RFQ with “profound disappointment” - the market is so central to these questions.

• It’s our job to let Ex Libris know our minds!

•  Caitlin Nelson clean up the Google Doc with an eye to sharing with OT/LG next time.

How do we want to move forward?

Have a plan for these meetings going forward that fit with the outcomes the team wants

5

Team

Team Charter: will review next time.

STANDING - Work Plan Directory review

5

Team

Parking Lot

Capture important topics for future discussion

Total

/60