...
Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Updates/announcements (Please add in advance) | Share information | 10 min. | All | TJ
| ||||
| 2 | Review “HOW TO: Rectify NZ bib with incorrect OCN due to erroneous change” draft | Get it ready for public consumption | 15 Check-in on NZ 9XX clean-up | Share common understanding on the progress | 10 min. | All | |||
| 3 | Pros/cons and tips of using Alma’s publishing profiles for OCLC holding maintenance | Better understanding of how Alma’s publishing profiles work | 15 min. | Catherine | |||||
| 4 | Exporting WorldCat records | Awareness of impact of different copy cataloging workflows | 15 min. | TJ | While working on ACTL, TJ discovered URIs associated with access points disappear from some Alma records due to record overlay, e.g. OCN 1458973372. After some investigation, TJ learned it has something to do with UCLA’s copy cataloging workflow. Question for the group: What’s your local policy related to exporting WorldCat records?u1458973372 | ||||
| 5 | Parking Lot | ProQuest ETD records (waiting for CDL folks to get back to us) https://docs.google.com/document/d/18_pZKpvg4KKShzyqrbwqP2p8Cf0SkC_wlfgxxGo2UzM/edit?usp=sharing Review updated Authority Control in the NZ Review best practices for import profiles (with Acquisitions and E-Resources Operations Subteams?) (see RMFG (Go-live and beyond) Best practices for repository* import profiles) “Modern MARC” records from LC (see documents from the latest BIBFRAME Forum). Is anyone planning on doing similar things with their MARC cataloging (e.g. not use 6XX form subdivisions and use 655 fields instead)? Will there be any significant effects on display and discovery? Tweak WDU config (contingent upon SCP’s cleanup progress) Review “HOW TO: Rectify NZ bib with incorrect OCN due to erroneous change” draft | |||||||
| 6 | Total | 55 50 min. |