...
The DCFG will explore Primo VE’s potential for making the UC’s rare and unique digital resources more discoverable and visible to our user community, and make policy and practice recommendations in support of this goal. CH +1 KT +1
Roles: What are the duties needed to get the work done? Who will take notes? Who will keep meetings on track/time? Who is responsible for tracking actions?
Notetaker: rotate among Step A members? rotate among attendees? (KT: General consensus from 4/27 meeting: we’ll ask for a volunteer to take notes during meetings for one month, then switch. All attendees can volunteer.)
Facilitator: agenda building (including estimating time for items), facilitating the meeting
Timekeeper: keep people aware of time and help them use it productively
Tracking actions: [CH: I think the notetaker will do this, or anyone can add an action item for themselves.]
...
Discussion: Do we want to add a Gatekeeper (see definition in Meeting Roles link above) role as well, or are we fine with just Facilitator, Notetaker, and Timekeeper?
(KT: I’m fine with just Facilitator, Notetaker and Timekeeper as assigned roles; we could all informally take steps to ensure gatekeeper functions are covered - ex: making sure everyone has time and space to speak if they’d like, asking for clarification on acronyms and jargon which may be unfamiliar)
What are our expectations for working together? Create a list of statements that the team agrees to uphold. For example, ask yourself: How do we make this group a safe space for transparent discussion (knowing that it might become contentious, and avoid back-channeling)? What are our ground rules for meetings? How do we ensure everyone is engaged? How do we ensure everyone has a voice? How will we resolve disagreements?
...
LS: I added in one line in the “Participate” section. +1 to the overall document. CH: +1 to overall Expectations document, including Lisa’s addition to Participate. KT: +1 to the document and to these changes.