Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1


Welcome

Catch-up and gathering together

10:00-10:05 am

all



2

Discussion Follow up topic: Should we, as a system, use CDI to manage OA resources?

Recommendation to appropriate group

10:06-11:10 am

all

Summary of discussions with TSELG, RMFG, CDL e-books strategies taskforce: this is a decision for a taskforce beyond just PSELG to pick up after migration on the question of when do we rely on the CDI for Open Access discovery of items, when do we catalog an OA item and who catalogs the item.

  • TSELG conversation: Each campus approaches cataloging OA items differently and a taskforce would need to understand what each campus does. The decision would impact local and centralized cataloging resources. There is much to be debated about the value of indexing versus the value of cataloging, the distinct purposes of each, and the resulting findability for the end-user. More TSELG detailed notes in Google Drive.

  • RMFG conversation: We can’t harmonize this practice before migration given other deadlines, so move the data and decide after July. More RMFG detailed notes in Google Drive.

  • CDL e-book strategies taskforce conversation: Policies and Procedures exist for shared cataloging of OA materials in the UCs. More CDL TF detailed notes in Google Drive.

Common threads from the discussions:

  • Each group thought there should be a system-wide decision as part of SILS with stakeholders beyond cataloging.

  • Each group felt unable to address the complexity of the issue alone because it had implications for workload, end-user functionality/discovery, and philosophical implications of how we (UC as a system) live our values related to OA.

  • The need to move through Vanguard to Implementation takes precedence over this discussion but the issue needs to be addressed post implementation.

Framework for discussion in PSELG:

  • Review documentation (links provided above) prior to 11/2/20 meeting.

  • Clarifying questions about problem: open group discussion.

  • Recommend pathways forward immediately, one of which is creating a decision page, and after July 2021 (please review examples in SILS Decision Rollup page)

3

Wrap-up and next steps

Review actions and assignments

11:11-11:20 am

all

4

PM Update - FYI

Update from Christine at the PPC meeting 10/30/20

n/a

  • Next steps after the PPC-IC meeting:

    • IC and PPC co-chairs will meet with SILS steering committee to discuss communications on 11/9

  • New round of Alma and Primo VE basics training has begun.

    • This is a repeat of the trainings done for VG. If there is anyone new to your FG, local groups or on a non-VG campus, please have them take these trainings now.

    • Anyone who has already taken them is welcome to take them again if they like. (Not required)

    • The full list of trainings and timeline can be found at UCS Implementation Alma & Primo VE Trainings

  • For a list of meetings:  https://public.3.basecamp.com/p/QFGRsCYCFR2A6Hobk1WBgYoL

    • Nov 5 Implementation kickoff (2 hour) -the invite should be on your calendar. Let me know if you need it.

    • Nov 9 Project update & User Management: (1 hour) - questions due by 11/4

    • Nov 16 project update & Fulfillment (1 hour) - questions due by 11/11

    • Dec 7 project update & Resource Management part 1 (1 hour) - questions due by 12/2

    • Dec 14 project update & Resource Management part 2 (1 hour) - questions due by 12/9

  • Migration meetings that may be of interest:

    • Nov 18 at 11-1 eResources

    • Nov 19 at 10-12 CDL IZ & NZ

    • Ask Lena if you would like her to forward the invite to either meeting.

5

Parking Lot

Capture important topics for future discussion

56

Total

80 min

Future agenda items

...