| View file | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Date: Nov. 19, 2020 Zoom:
...
Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Introduction-Discovery members | 10 | Danelle | https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G4cFgI6gt0XzED5gJu_nc553Te1hJNeqAg6H754Bw4g/edit | |||
| 2 | Discovery Report | Update on Discovery Decisions | 35 | Heather and Chizu | |||
| 3 | Unlinking spec coll records from NZ | Randy Brandt | Discussion about whether or not campuses will link their spec coll records to the NZ during migration, in order to protect them from being obscured if they are not the first record to load to the NZ. Spec Coll Cataloging CKG recommended that each campus determine whether or not to unlink records from the NZ. The Vanguard has shown that Primo searches each campus’ IZ and linking records to NZ is not a requirement for consortial discovery. Vanguard campuses that loaded later in the queue noted some loss of cataloging enhancements and/or inheritance of other institutions’ improperly coded local data from the NZ version of the record for spec coll records. Final Test load order has not yet been decided. There is one more final vote today. UCLA and UCR are going to go ahead and link their records in the Test load and see what is lost. | ||||
| 4 | Parking Lot | Capture important topics for future discussion | 5 | open | |||
| 5 | Total | 50 |
...