Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Jackie Gosselar, UC Berkeley

  • Jessica Kruppa, UC Riverside, Chair 

  • Jess Waggoner, UC Santa Cruz

  • Gem Stone-Logan, California Digital Library;

  • Jared Campbell, UC Davis;

  • Zoe Tucker, UC Los Angeles

  • Anna Kahrs, UC San Francisco

  • Joe Ameen, UC Merced;

  • Sean Claudio, UC Irvine 

  • Douglas Worsham, UC San Diego

Not Present:

  • Joe Ameen, UC Merced;

  • Michael Craig, UC Santa Barbara

  • Douglas Worsham, UC San Diego

...

Meeting Recording:

Excerpt
hiddentrue

Decision Page: CDI Limit by Availability [Phase 4 delegated]

This was a test. Did adding Custom Resource types for Reports and Looseleafs actually do any good?

  • Sean spot checked a few and the Reports were working. Still waiting on confirmation for looseleaf.

  • Libguides: We’re pulling them in via Primo Import, they don’t live in Alma, so there may be no way to fix it.

  • Zoe says that it could be imported with a norm rule that would make them viewable in the NZ.

  • Item

    Desired Outcome

    Notes

    Decisions / Discussion

    Actions

    1

    Sharing and Updates

    Share any Discovery related information from other SILS groups

    2

    Does anyone want to be on the Discovery steering committee with Chair/Vice?

    Chairs of ERMS and Fulfillment are out until the 16th. There may be a delay in getting a response about the CDI Limit by Availability

    Review the Decision Page. Is there anything else that our group wants to add? If no, it’ll be sent to eResources and Fulfillment.

    3

    Local Resource Type

    NZ Sandbox Local Resource Type Update:

    • Reports - ready to test

    • Looseleafs - ready to test

    Concerns (Slack me if you want to troubleshoot any of these together):

    • Datasets - This uses the 593 $a but when I tried to create a set using the "local notes" index, it didn't retrieve any results. I assumed the 593 $a just isn't available in the NZ for IZ records.

    • Video Games - This also uses the 593 $a but to my surprise, it did retrieve 4 records. Though, surely there aren't just 4 records? In any case, I've run the job against the four that exist (Nier : Automata, Star wars jedi : fallen order, Hollow knight, and Assassin's creed: Origins)

    • LibGuides - used dc:type libguide. When I search for that, I get no results. I can't remember who requested this one? We might need to follow-up more as I don't think our Alma side has Dublin Core records?

    4

    FRBR Preferred Records

    Remind ourselves how we want to approach this issue. This is what we’ll work on when we come back January 13th.

    FRBR/DEDUP Preferred Records

    5

    To think about:

    • Should we create a 2+ member Discovery Steering Committee to plan work and manage the timeline?

      • Any volunteers?

    • Should we schedule open, optional study halls that can be used for testing with a buddy, addressing/exploring issues that come up, etc.?

      • Jessica is always willing to buddy up for testing. Schedule is flexible. Shoot me a message.

    6

    New Vice Chair

    Appoint a new vice chairpage.

    Welcome Anna Kahrs!

    Let Jessica and Gem know if anyone wants to join the agenda discussions on off weeks (steering committee lite)

    Jessica sent an email directly to AskSILS about getting Joshua Gomez and Lisa Weber access to Confluence and Slack.

    2

    Temperature Check: Local Resource Types

    Which campuses care about LRT, which don’t? Is everyone ok with seeing these resource types in the NZ.

    Who is the point person for each resource type that Gem can work with directly?

    Gem’s already been working with Sean (UCI) for Reports and loose leaf.

    UCSC and UCSD will send Gem info for who to directly work with for the outstanding custom resource types (Datasets, Video Games, LibGuides, Podcasts*)

    *Podcasts is a new request from UCSD.

    3

    FRBR Preferred Records

    Is everyone good with the testing plan?

    Is the 26th a good end date for testing so we can discuss results on the 27th?

    Does anyone want/need to get together for group testing?

    FRBR/DEDUP Preferred Records

    Another option: Get configuration changed by the 26th so we can do group testing on the 27th?

    ====

    Davis can get done by the 26th.

    Zoe/Jackie: Group testing will be a good opportunity.

    UCR and UCD have been doing local testing and will be ready with test results on the 27th.

    UCSD has a meeting about the testing on the 17th.

    As a group, we will get the settings changed in sandbox and do group testing and discussion on the 27th.

    4

    5

    Pre/Post meeting Discussion comments and thoughts

    ...