| Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions |
---|
1 | Gather & Announcements | Assemble as a group and share info | 5 | Team | | Okay to skip this meeting; use the time slot for others to discuss on Slack if needed | | | |
22 | Interim Report | Decide Structure of our Report | 15 | Team | | Becky volunteers to write a section. Jared and Carla will also help write. Google Docs comments will highlight who writes what. NA will act as a reader/editor. | |
3 | Work plan goal discussion: Provide recommendations for models of work | Continue discussion of models of work for OARM; start to develop recommended workflows to propose to stakeholders | | 40Compile a list of questions from our documents & discussions; decide which questions our group can answer, and which an ongoing group could tackle; decide on recommendations to propose | 25 | Carla/All | Revisit the models of work and principles, see Phase 2 Report. Note that we’ve agreed that OA resources should be managed in the NZ Brainstorming for an ongoing OA Ongoing OA Workflow management group, see: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EQ0pucwod2X9_Tmf7gtEgI8Oz5tb3I8QUD6kDnOoLZM/edit#heading=h.jm4d4qcjezwf NotesProposed Recommendations: Becky: have SCP continue to process collections and single journals Proposed group adds flexibility for campuses or SCP to process collections How to handle transformative agreements with an OA component? Group should include liaising with those working in analytics so we can assess transformative agreements - assessment is done only for content with a paid component JSC provides guidance on priority of processing the OA resources they approve How does this group make a determination to activate a large collection?
| 3 | https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1AjbCCgcFJGjfOChyGyr2CK6jzWXbx0mnqVMKtCw--Nw/edit Notes: | | |
4 | Report back from SILS groups | Understand what other SILS groups and campuses are doing in relation to OA | 3 | All | | | |
45 | Wrap up & Homework | Review actions and decisions | 2 | Team | | | |
56 | Parking Lot | Capture important topics for future discussion | | Team | How to find items that are OA but have slipped thru the cracks, not being labeled OA? Something coming from Discovery group Another area is to rethink JSC and whether they want to continue approval role. Considering ongoing maintenance of OA in Alma/Primo - who is responsible? Statistics/Resource Management as related to the workflow Related to CZ Updates Task List: Consider a cleanup project to compile a list of open access collections in the IZ that are already activated in the NZ. Deactivate and delete those collections from the IZ. This would help with maintenance since we would not have to sift through redundant data if we decided to use the CZ updates task list. Solving the missing OA links issue: determine what is within our scope: From Becky: UCSD’s Serials Cataloging Group has the following info as to how UCSD is handling this. Please read the following especially the Content Corner Update: “Are we doing anything with the Community Zone Updates Task List at the moment? When a portfolio is deleted from a community-managed CZ collection, the IZ copy of the portfolio is deactivated and unlinked from the CZ and becomes a "local" portfolio. We currently have no way of being notified of these changes except via targeted periodic sweeps. Using the CZ updates task list would give us a list of updates that directly affect our resources. Who would review the updates, how often, etc.? Who would take care of cleanup?”
a. Content corner: 2022 Alma CKB Release Notes: September-December b. Who would review the list of the updates and do the cleanup? TBD.
| | |
67 | | Total | 60/60 | | | | |