...
Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Local group takeaways | Actions | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Updates | 10 mins | Liz | PPC finalized configuration for form recommendations Essentials training debrief
“Local group takeaways” section added to meeting agenda/notes | ||||
2 | Local authority subgroup | Decide whether a temporary subgroup is necessary and if so who will join | 15 mins | Is it time for a subgroup to look at these and report back or do we know enough now to make a recommendation?
| Yes | UCSD and UCLA will take the lead but anyone can join if interested | Liz will put together a meeting | |
3 | OCLC updates | Decide whether a temporary subgroup is necessary and if so who will join | 15 mins | Is it time for a subgroup to look at this and report back?
Is there interest in re-examining pre-populating the NZ with an OCLC master file? No need to decide today, just general curiosity. (this can be deferred until after the review of the Updates Page) | Yes Hermine Jean Sarah Liz Full roster next meeting | Ask local groups if you have anyone else who should be included | Assemble roster by next RM meeting | |
4 | Testing | Review existing testing documentation and determine how to handle our Vanguard decision pages | 40 mins | All | We Over the next 2 weeks we need to prioritize and assess our Vanguard decision pages and identify ones areas that impact data cleanup and data migration
ILSDC has a spreadsheet that we can use to record our own testing that affects/reflects data migration and cleanup
Other testing around harmonization, impacts on discovery, workflows, etc (all the “so what?”). should be recorded elsewhere. How do we want to do that?
How should we divide up work? (deferred) | FG will comment/review template and continue working on a test plan next week | Everyone should review the draft test template and propose necessary changes or additions by the next RM meeting |
Future agenda items
mapping for 700/7XX fields
...