Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Page Properties
label

Status

Status
colourYellowGreen
titleIN PROGRESSDECIDED

Scope

IMPLEMENTATION

Description

Decide how to handle WorldCat scope. Harmonize? If so, how?

Decision

Discovery FG recommends not harmonizing on Worldcat integration. We outline below three recommended approaches to integration from which Instead, campuses should choose one of the options outlined below, according to their user needs. This decision should be revisited within 6 months of go live.

Owning group

Discovery FG Josephine Tan and Jess Waggoner, co-chairs

Approver

Discovery FGPPC

Stakeholders

R = Discovery FG
A = Discovery FG
C = CDL, Resource Management FG, Fulfillment FG
I = EUOS, Local Stakeholders, ICs

Decision-making process

  1. Review options

  2. Consult with SILS and local stakeholders

Priority

Mandatory before Go-live

Due date

June 8,

Recommendations

...

Worldcat-Primo Integration:

Discovery FG recommends allowing campuses to choose one of three options for Worldcat/Primo integration most appropriate for based on their campus user needs. The following are recommended approaches to integration:: 1. separate profile; 2. link out to WorldCat; 3. combination.

1. Display Worldcat materials within Primo via a separate search profile

  • Image Modified

Access using this option:

...

  • Users cannot facet Worldcat items (though Advanced Search will still work)

  • Every item status in the brief results is “Check Availability” - even items we own at UCSC; for items we own, the complete holdings will appear
    Items that would display holdings in the brief results within the Articles, Books, and More search profile will not display holdings in the brief results of the Worldcat search profile, though these holdings will display once the user clicks into the full record display

  • Users cannot see which libraries outside of UC have holdings for the item
    Some users may choose to use in-person services at a nearby library rather than place a request; they will need to navigate to native Worldcat to see a list of libraries with holdings

  • Inclusion of certain symbols or special characters within the query term appear to be incompatible (specifically “-” and “#”)

...

  • Users can utilize the robust faceting capabilities of Worldcat

  • Users can quickly see a list of libraries that have holdings for the item

...

  • Users must navigate out to a separate system to discover materials

  • Using UC-eLinks “Get it at UC” to request materials may be less intuitive to new users (and, depending upon which Worldcat we send users to, could require VPN/Proxy to see the “Get it at UC” button)

3.

...

Both: link(s) out to Worldcat and create a separate search profile

...

Version of Worldcat

Discovery FG recommends allowing campuses to choose whether they will send their users to Worldcat.org or their campus Basic Worldcat Discovery when using a native Worldcat interface will benefit their users.

If a campus does choose to link to Worldcat.org, Discovery FG recommends that the campus indicate to the user that they must be on campus VPN/Proxy in order to access the “Get it at UC” link/button to make a request. This could be done in the text around the link, the link text itself, or via a pop-up alert for users not on the campus IP (see UCI’s VPN pop-up code).

Reasoning

Each approach has pros and cons. Campuses should consult with local stakeholders (eg. instruction, reference, and interlibrary loan departments) to determine which approach best fits their needs.

This decision should be revisited within 6 months of go live.

Environmental Scan

Example libraries:

Background

  • Melvyl-like functionality for ILL is a desired feature - especially for books not held in the UC system.

  • WorldCat results can be “blended” with other results; however, it doesn’t work as smoothly as we’d like.

Dependencies

Work with Resource Management FG

Requesting Materials Not Available at UC

Users will still use the Request form within their campus Primo to request materials from outside of the UC system.

These requests can be initiated in a number of ways, including:

  1. Records found in a Primo search profile, such as the Worldcat search profile, or CDI materials in the Articles, Books, and More search profile (when libraries do not filter by availability or users expand their search)
    A link to the Request form should appear in the How to Get It tab in these records for signed-in users.

  2. OpenURL records generated via “Fetch Item”
    Users enter citation information to generate the OpenURL record. A link to the Request form should appear in the How to Get It tab in these records for signed-in users. Note that users can enter very minimal citation information, which can result in low quality request submissions.

  3. OpenURL records generated via “Get It at UC” (ie. link resolver)
    When users click the “Get it at UC” button, they will be directed to an OpenURL record in their campus Primo. If the desired item is not available at their UC, signed-in users will see a link to the Request form in the How to Get It tab.

  4. Blank ILL Request form
    Users manually enter a citation into a resource sharing request form. This option does not check Primo to see if the item is available at the local campus before submission of the request. Also runs the risk of low quality request submissions due to minimally required citation information.

Discovery of Materials via Worldcat

While there are multiple options (outlined above) for requesting materials from outside UC, Worldcat integration using one of the options detailed in the recommendations section will be needed for the discovery of these materials.

We identified two primary methods for the discovery of Worldcat content: 1) from within Primo itself via a search profile constructed using the Worldcat API, 2) providing users with a link out to Worldcat where users can use the “Get it at UC” button.

Two Versions of Worldcat

Two versions of Worldcat are available to UC campus libraries: Worldcat.org and “Basic Worldcat Discovery.” Discoverey FG declined to recommend one version over the other.

  • Basic WorldCat Discovery makes it easier to get back to Primo for ILL. The major identified difference between the two systems is that Basic Discovery will display the “Get It at UC” button to all users, regardless of authentication status. In contrast, Worldcat.org will require users to be authenticated (on campus IP) in order to display the “Get It at UC” button.

  • Campuses do need to consider options. Even for campuses that choose to include a Worldcat search profile in Primo, there will be times where users may benefit from using a native Worldcat interface rather than the Primo-mediated discovery experience. Therefore, campuses will need to determine which version of Worldcat they will recommend to users.

  • Basic WorldCat Discovery is what most campuses are using. Most campus libraries have indicated that they plan to point users to Basic Worldcat Discovery rather than Worldcat.org, when needed. Discovery FG is working on a separate decision regarding the configuration of Basic Worldcat Discovery.

  • Both versions of WorldCat send similar data to Primo via OpenURL. Based on brief comparative testing, we believe that both Worldcat.org and Basic Worldcat Discovery send similar data to generate the OpenURL page in Primo.

Working Assumptions

  • Resource Sharing will be enabled/available for records generated via OpenURL

Dependencies

  • Work with Fulfillment FG and CDL to ensure all options are viable

  • Adequate time for any implementation work and testing required by CDL

  • Adequate time for implementation work and testing required by local teams

Questions to consider

  • User needs. How much will our researchers appreciate the ability to start an ILL directly from the Primo interface?

  • Common use scenarios. How do our researchers use WorldCat Worldcat searching, and how well are they supported by including a separate WorldCat scope or including WorldCat records in a blended searchWorldcat scope versus a link out to Worldcat?

    • Example scenario: WorldCat Worldcat (on campuses that do not use WC Discovery) is used frequently by more advanced researchers looking for a known item that’s not available on their campus. So, for example, a search for older, more unique less-common monographs.

  • No fielded searches in Primo, e.g. in WorldCat you can search ti:[title term] au:[author name] (but Advanced Search does work with the WC search profile)

    Quality of WorldCat-only search . Primo’s search functions for WorldCat data are significantly worse than WorldCat for precision searches. (Other libraries, e.g. Northwestern, have handled this by providing a link to WorldCat instead of using Primo.)

  • No facets display in Primo.

  • scope. Primo facets are unavailable within the Worldcat search profile. Discovery FG has also discovered that some special characters (a hyphen with no trailing space and the pound/hash symbol) erroneously result in no records retrieved. How do these limitations impact the user experience and can these impacts be ameliorated?

  • Quality of blended search. How well does it work?

Action Log

Action/Point Person

Expected Completion Date

Notes

Status

Each Disco Discovery FG member: get feedback from local group on WorldCat search profile

Jan 15, 2021

completeComplete

Disco Discovery FG: perform environmental scan that 1. reviews choice (separate, blended, neither and point to WorldCat) and 2. reviews functionality

Mar 16, 2021

Complete

Disco Discovery FG: confirm common use scenarios

May 4, 2021

  1. WorldCat in search profile scope: UCSD, UCSC, UCSF

  2. WorldCat only in Advanced search: UCB, UCSB

  3. WorldCat icon in results facet (Northwestern model seems to be 1 +3 ;and UCSF may do this)

Complete

Discovery FG consult with RMFG, Fulfillment, and CDL

June 4, 2021

Complete

Discovery FG finalizes recommendations

June 8, 2021

Complete