Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Jackie Gosselar, UC Berkeley

  • Jared Campbell, UC Davis

  • Joshua Gomez, UC Los Angeles 

  • Zoe Tucker, UC Los Angeles

  • Joe Ameen, UC Merced

  • Michele Mizejewski, UC San Francisco

  • Jess Waggoner, UC Santa Cruz

  • Jessica Kruppa, UC Riverside, Chair 

  • Michael Craig, UC Santa Barbara

  • Douglas Worsham, UC San Diego

  • Sean Claudio, UC Irvine 

  • Gem Stone-Logan, California Digital Library;

Not Present:

  • Joe Ameen, UC Merced;

  • Jared Campbell, UC Davis;

  • Michele Mizejewski, UC San Francisco

...

Meeting Recording:

Excerpt
hiddentrue

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions / Discussion

Actions

1

Sharing and Updates

Share any Discovery related information from other SILS groups

5

All

Reminder to check with local teams about the WorldCat Discovery ask.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bY5hY9XrsN1JRuM0bltf-rYdIBSfeyDkw9JSU-Lofjc/edit?usp=drive_web&ouid=117189209763038186134Ultimate outcome: Choose up to six titles for the links, populate the values either with your URL or “OPT OUT”; edit existing spreadsheet; let SILSOps Center know when ready.

2

Taking the temperature

Redefine the Discovery Subteam and establish concrete structure so we can accomplish meaningful “meaty” work.

There are no wrong answers

  • What were your individual expectations for this team?

  • What do you feel isn’t working?

  • What hurdles do you face locally in testing the items on the workplan currently?

  • What support do you need?

  • Are we accidentally giving ourselves boring and useless assignments?

  • Is there enough work for two separate teams?

    • Not everyone is interested/skilled in the same things. Must we all do the same things and projects?

    • Are we willing to divide responsibility by expertise? Say, have a number of members delegated to handle the UX projects while the rest trust their recommendations? And then others work on functionality, and so on.

      • Yes, there’s the membership issue, we’ll cross that bridge when we get there and make something that works.

  • The Chair is allowed to “Form and task subgroup(s) as necessary.” If the UX team is a subgroup within Discovery, then how does that change things?

Reference: Shared governance structure, charges and work practices

3

To think about:

  • Should we create a 2+ member Discovery Steering Committee to plan work and manage the timeline?

  • Should we schedule open, optional study halls that can be used for testing with a buddy, addressing/exploring issues that come up, etc.?

4

New Vice Chair

Appoint a new vice chair

Pre/Post meeting Discussion comments and thoughts

stick stuff here

Joe Ameen (UCM) - Sorry I can’t be present today. Being relatively new to this group, I’m not hoping to steer the boat in any way. I trust that any discussion or decision made will be in the best interest of SILS. Merced doesn’t have a lot of people power to throw at testing, but I’m happy to help however I can.