Page Comparison

Gather & Announcements

Assemble as a group and share info

Discuss recurring meeting time

510

Team

• Potential meeting times: every other Tuesday, 11am or 12pm

1st and 3rd Tuesdays at 10 am for new meetings going forward

Review Work Plan Draft

Achieve consensus on work plan

Prioritize work items

25

All

• Remember that this is a living document and we can change or update as needed

• Feedback on OA Activation by Campus in progress, see https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1HwMeWgIaUaLf9oM8CyYfrOHZN2UE2Kgyqcf6JAlhe8E/edit#gid=0

Continue to share feedback on Work Plan draft, with goal of finalizing deliverables

Discuss Questions from OARM Chart

#1 - What is considered OA?

#2 - How do we decide to use OCLC/vendor or CZ records, and what are the minimum requirements for a quality bib record?

Finish our review of the SCP OA Definition document

Discuss concerns listed here

Determine next steps for document content

25

All

• Are we replacing the CDL page, or are we moving ahead on our own with a separate document/section in our final report?

  • Pros of new page; could offer flexibility as a living document as OA environment changes

  • Clarification that this definition is meant to be operational and guide the types of resources that will undergo any OA workflows and processes team develops

Will proceed with creating separate document

Carla to add content to Workflow narrative

Review Work Plan Draft

Achieve consensus on work plan

Prioritize work items

25

All

• Remember that this is a living document and we can change or update as needed

Carla to ask E-resources subteam to update the OA activity spreadsheet

Continue to share feedback on Work Plan draft, with goal of finalizing deliverables

Discuss which questions from our workflow chart to prioritize

20

All

• Question #1 answered: OA Definition and Evaluation Criteria added to workflow narrative, see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EQ0pucwod2X9_Tmf7gtEgI8Oz5tb3I8QUD6kDnOoLZM/edit ; consider for the future creating a definition that could be used for a public-facing page

• Should we work on OCLC/vendor vs. CZ records or is there another topic we want to take up? See topics: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uePQ2PILLV2ZjIyAoHvZy6PiKNsLUSAlovt-vHq0B_Y/edit

Yoko will share the updated spreadsheet to E-Resources (unless E-Resources has already collected this information)

Report back from SILS groups

Understand what other SILS groups and campuses are doing in relation to OA

3

All

• E-Resources -

• Discovery -

• Resource Management -

• Campus Updates -

• Other (JSC, SCLG, CKGs, etc.) -

Wrap up & Homework

Review actions and decisions

2

Team

Parking Lot

Capture important topics for future discussion

Team

• How to find items that are OA but have slipped thru the cracks, not being labeled OA?

• Something coming from Discovery group

• Another area is to rethink JSC and whether they want to continue approval role.

• Considering ongoing maintenance of OA in Alma/Primo - who is responsible?

  • Because OA would be in the NZ, most maintenance requests would go through CDL Helpline - where in CDL would these requests go?

    • From CDL: With broken links, Helpline will route the issue to the CDL Acq staff, in some cases we may loop in SCP, to review what needs to be done in Alma.

    • For troubleshooting OA:

      With collections like ROAD, DOAJ, or Free e-Journals, those are turned on in bulk with thousands of titles -- and the titles are not individually requested by users either. If we can’t immediately find a correct URL or the user doesn’t suggest one when reporting the issue, we will just deactivate the portfolio. In short, not a lot of time is spent trying to fix a problem with one of those types of collections. With a collection like this, the titles are all coming from individual publishers and it will more often be the case that there is a problem with a single title and not the full collection, such as a small OA website disappearing from the internet.

      If there is a problem with an entire CZ-collection, we can report it to Ex Libris to resolve. 

      For OA collections maintained locally, SCP may batch update the URLs too.  

      Of course there are also OA materials that we pay to support. Generally speaking, those would be treated as if they are paid collections and we would work with the publisher to resolve any issues there.

• Statistics/Resource Management as related to the workflow

• Related to CZ Updates Task List: Consider a cleanup project to compile a list of open access collections in the IZ that are already activated in the NZ. Deactivate and delete those collections from the IZ. This would help with maintenance since we would not have to sift through redundant data if we decided to use the CZ updates task list.

• “OA cooperative”

• Solving the missing OA links issue: determine what is within our scope:

  • From Becky: UCSD’s Serials Cataloging Group has the following info as to how UCSD is handling this. Please read the following especially the Content Corner Update:

    1. “Are we doing anything with the Community Zone Updates Task List at the moment? When a portfolio is deleted from a community-managed CZ collection, the IZ copy of the portfolio is deactivated and unlinked from the CZ and becomes a "local" portfolio. We currently have no way of being notified of these changes except via targeted periodic sweeps. Using the CZ updates task list would give us a list of updates that directly affect our resources.  Who would review the updates, how often, etc.? Who would take care of cleanup?”

    a.      Content corner: 2022 Alma CKB Release Notes: September-December

    b.     [Moved to Parking Lot]

    c.      Who would review the list of the updates and do the cleanup? TBD.

Models of work for next mtg’s (please look at the phase 2 doc before hand)

Total

60/60