...
Legend:
| Status | ||
|---|---|---|
|
| Status | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Status | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Status | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Page Properties | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Background
Phase 4 delegated work plan deliverable:
Create a shared storage space where the entire license documents for UC Tier 1-3 e-resource licenses can reside, so that we can compare terms obtained previously within the system. It would be of additional benefit to share information about ongoing license negotiations, as well as those that have failed and reasons why.
CDL has already implemented the display of Tier 1/2 license terms in Primo. For discussion here, license terms are different from sharing the full legal agreement.
There is no collective project to display Tier 3 license terms – this may be locally determined as campuses are at different phases of their implementation and familiarity with Alma Licensing. Again sharing license terms in Primo is very different from a select group of librarians sharing full license agreements.
Tier 3 - need to distinguish between Tier 3 acquisitions that are linked to a Tier 1 agreement (i.e. adding a Taylor & Francis title using an addendum that is linked to Tier 1 agreement - Assisted Tier 3s). Also there are local resources with potential to roll up to a Tier 1 or 2 acquisition, or small specialized database of interest to only one campus.
E-resources team assumes that the project to display license terms is a different discussion than actually uploading license documents for sharing
To date, the only existing UCLAS group associated with this type of work is the CDL Licensing Liaisons, which exists outside of the SILS structure. Given the CDL website has no record of group activity, this may be outside the scope of the Licensing Liaisons, and an alternative structure may be forming a CKG for this work.
See This issue has been discussed by several campus represented committees involving both SILS Phase 4 and SILS Operations. Phase 4 work item from initiated by TSELG, after AFEG where it was then shared with AFEG who reviewed and responded, subsequently . TSELG also sent request for endorsement comment to SCLG. AEFG did not include this deliverable in its licensing-related hand off items to SILS Operations. TSELG included this in their hand off as a high priority for SILS Operations.
| View file | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Licensing - AEFG Document
AEFG Response to TSELG
TSELG roster - former group of local campuses campus representatives interested in leveraging multi-campus discounts for existing acquisitions
FocusDelegated deliverable: TSELG SILS was aSILS Phase 4 escalation group for Alma migration areas including which included acquisitions, e-resources, cataloging, metadata, and discovery.
SCLG roster - CDL vertical of authority, focused on licensing new content
Focus: SCLG is the UC Libraries advisory group for decision-making related to UC-wide collection development and management.
ERES roster - Operations team with campus representation.
Approached this deliverable from the framework that campus representatives are closest to the local work , recognizing under and familiar with current priorities, . Concluded that campuses do not have extra capacity to perform detailed overlap analysis of locally licensed resources across the UC and request CDL take on the work of initiating new multi-campus negotiations under Tier 1 or Tier 2 licenses. This would require a higher level of administration to facilitate additional resources or re-prioritization of current resources.
Recommendations
CENTRAL REPOSITORY
...