| 2 | Mid-phase assessment | Discuss and further shape the assessment scope and goals (see draft here - based on the 06/30 SGTF discussion and presenting a strawperson pitch for how we might scope the assessment) Determine next steps to finalize the scope and goals document (due to SILS WG on Aug. 03). Identify subgroup (2-3 people) to lead next steps in Assessment work (see work plan, stage 2)
* SGTF members should review and begin commenting on the draft assessment scope and goals in advance of the meeting. * | 00:45 | Ginny | | | Discussion notes were also captured in the draft google doc. Task force members noted that priorities for assessment are falling into one of two categories: how is shared governance working right now (specific to components that may continue, post-go-live)? And how do individuals vision SILS governance moving forward? Members affirmed that all goals should be actionable; they should us and help enable a better structure for ongoing governance. Members affirmed that individuals (as opposed to groups) should respond to the assessment, though individuals might be asked both about individual the work of applicable groups as well as their own responsibilities. Demographic data will also be collected, to allow SGTF to dis-aggregate responses (e.g. campus, group membership/participation in the systemwide SILS structure). Additional facets might be whether the respondent is part of the Vanguard and/or already on Alma/Primo. Task force members agreed that while not part of the mid-phase assessment, the charges and structure for post-go-live governance should reflect the need for ongoing assessment.
| Decision: Kevin and Alan will form a subgroup to guide and further the assessment work (e.g. to begin considering the design and instrument selection). | Action: SGTF members should continue to review the draft assessment scope and goals, and submit feedback by July 22nd (a draft will then be cleaned up and shared with SILS-WG for their feedback). |