| Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions |
---|
1 | Housekeeping | Add any new topics to the agenda Take a temperature check / How is it going? Confirm Minutes Recorder for this meeting - Lai Arakawa CoShare co-Chairchair update Affirm Vacations/Out document
| 5 min | Greg | Shared Google drive | | |
2 | Patron Data Q&A with Ex Libris | | 5 min | Greg | Ex Libris is scheduling Q&A sessions with individual SILS groups. Questions must be presented to them in writing ahead of time We could use our Questions for Up Stream document to collect questions and then discuss for prioritization and submission
| No need to schedule Q&A with Ex Libris at this time. | |
3 | Guidelines for Minutes | | 10 min | Greg | | 3Everyone has agreed to the Guidelines | |
4 | Tasks & Deliverables Confirm - Has everyone located and begun reviewing the migration form and data extraction documentation for your current ILS system? | Confirm - Single UC-wide patron record database or separate institutional patron databases? Confirm - Should we migrate expired patron records? From Governance Charge - An inventory of current patron data sources and system integrations at the campuses.
A list of patron data cleanup activities and assignments that need to be accomplished prior to the initial data migration. A list of patron data issues which require harmonization decisions, to be made available to the Implementation Coordinators group. A register of post-migration quality control tests and results from each campus implementation team. Due late 2021. A final report of any ongoing post-migration data issues. Due late 2021.
| 30 min | Greg | Status - Link to document in Outcome column. Documentation illustrates fields that need to be focused on and fields that might be different. IC will be responsible for downloading, completing and submitting forms. Communication needed between you and them to ensure nothing is missed. Status- 10 min | Greg | Ex Libris Migration Guides & Tutorials Status - Single UC-wide patron record database or separate institutional patron databases?
Greg opened a Still awaiting decision from Fulfillment & ILL FG; due date is May 21st Decision page within the IC Confluence space and is still awaiting responseInitial preference is to have a decentralized patron database. CSU’s strongly recommend. Priority options are being evaluated
Due date is currently May 21, 2020 have not received any feedback from the group yet
Status - Should we migrate expired patron records? Greg opened a Still awaiting decision from Fulfillment & ILL FG; due date is May 21st Decision page within the IC Confluence space and is still awaiting responseDue date is currently May 21, 2020
From Governance Charge - An inventory of current patron data sources and system integrations at the campuses. Greg confirmed with Caitlin Nelson and IC group that this requested inventory already exists and need not be replicated. See Major integrations The ICs are currently working on the completion of 3rd Party Integration spreadsheets and may communicate with their respective PDCG member for information related to any patron data (e.g., Student Information Systems) integrations; the spreadsheet is due to Ex Libris by May 29, 2020 A list of patron data cleanup activities and assignments that need to be accomplished prior to the initial data migration. How best to document this for the group? Example of UCSD spreadsheet can be a good place to start - but do what makes sense for you and your data. Still waiting on an answer for single database standardization, but for now we can focus on our own data. Some of your data might transfer directly into Alma, some might not.Created a “Local Campus Data Cleanup Documents” folder in Patron Data Google share. UCSD and UCI have provided documents thus far; others should as well, following structure/format of their choosing. Sites already on Alma should obviously have much less data cleanup.
UCI also provided a copy of a Patron Data report from their 2018 migration to Alma that documents decisions and actions they completed, in addition to lessons learned. UCSD will be creating a similar document; should we all for final documentation/report? Other formatting requirements that we may need to think about?
A list of patron data issues which require harmonization decisions, to be made available to the Implementation Coordinators group. Impacted highly by decision above regarding single or separate patron databases If we’re decentralized, there might not be a need (or very limited: ILL). How do we identify a student from another campus (does it happen seamlessly on the backend?).
How best to document this for the group? Tabled.
| | - All - 1. Locate and begin reviewing the migration form and data extraction documentation for your current ILS system. Link to main page in the Outcome column, the form for your ILS should be listed on that page.
- All - 4b. Begin creating your local patron data audit and cleanup document
| 5Still tabled until there is resolution on question of single versus separate patron record databases.
| | |
5 | Patron (User) Barcodes in Alma | | 20 min | | Some UC campuses, who are not already on Alma have multiple barcodes in some of their patron records. Proxy Cards having their own barcodes Extraction - how should we clean up to not flood the barcode field? Can you only transfer only one barcode through migration? Formatting - Can patron barcodes be alpha numeric? Through SIS, are certain fields designated for protection?
| | |
6 | Homework | | | | | | All - (ONGOING) Add questions for up stream - David will create a folder in the shared Google drive and a document whereby will will establish guidelines for completing meeting notes. All team members will review and make comments (Due next week: the 18th).
- All - Provide examples of master (anonymous) patron data cleanup spreadsheets or documentation into folder in Google Drive.
| 6Alma Sites |
7 | Parking Lot | | | | | | |
78 | | Total | x/x | | | | |