...
Not attending
...
Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Welcome | Catch-up and gathering together | 10:00-10:04 am | all | Rose/thorn: brief round-robin of something that made you smile, and/or something that is a bit of thorn. Voluntary. | ||
| 2 | Record zoom session | shared decision | 10:05 | Team agrees to record meetings. | Beth C will add this to our Google drive for future reference. | ||
| 3 | ExL Q+A session | 10:06-11:00 am | This ExLibris document was reference several times re: records in IZ and NZ. See pages 8, 11, 36, 41. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1XprzWYKURDRmUptWGid9VtS1gum-aLj8 Local bib records that may only be in the IZ include rooms and equipment etc. UC Libraries will need to make decisions about scoping and whether or not these decisions are left to each campus. SUNY system appears to use different scopes at different institutions. e.g. Buffalo In Primo, end-users should see a single record for an item and be presented with the appropriate URL when electronic. Discussion re: proxy and VPN. This is set at the collection level. Having one or both should not be an issue. Fulfillment options can be set up as desired. Written Responses from ExLibris
Response: When activating collections in the NZ, proxy should be enabled but specific proxy doesn't need to be selected so that Alma knows to check the proxy in the institution that collection is activated for. b. Special parameters need to be configured where the collection is managed. If the collection is activated and managed in the IZ, it should be configured at the service level in the IZ. If the collection is activated and managed in the NZ, it should be configured at the service level in the IZ.
Response: It's a local/consortial decision. Typical example is local notes. See example policy on local fields from consortia that have implemented Alma with NZ: https://calstate.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/URM/pages/78172584/Local+Fields+in+Alma+Primo https://slcny.libguides.com/ld.php?content_id=49705411 https://www.carli.illinois.edu/products-services/i-share/alma/cataloging/local_extensions
Response: In a collaborative network environment,
a. bib records that are linked to shared NZ records in which shared NZ records are used. The source bib record you see in Primo is the shared NZ bib.
| https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1XprzWYKURDRmUptWGid9VtS1gum-aLj8 | |||
| 4 | Announcements/Questions |
| 11:01-11:05 am | Rikke has volunteered. | Rikke is co-chair. | ||
| 5 | Discussion. Accept as final or continue revisions | 11:05-11:25 am | Intended to use with documents we received. We anticipate that documents may include more than one option/pathway forward. Add information on ensuring that SILS groups have been consulted. This is different from Line 19. Discussed ways in which there could be short-term pain but long term benefits. Retain both 24 & 25. Discussion regarding how failure might be defined. Failure could be influenced by lack of bandwidth. Noted that all options coming to this group may have both benefits and challenges. Option viability oculd could also be inclufend influenced by who has to incure incur the costs. Some discussion of Benefit/Risk matrix. | Edits & Additions New, Line 13: Add information on consultations with SILS groups. Edit, Line 25: Ask individuals to define failure in Notes. New, Line 38: Address if there are ways to address challenges for X option. New, Lines 42 & 43: Call out if costs are incurred by a single campus or by UC Libraries. Edit, Line 55: Level of PSELG support, clarified “group support” Members feel free to make comments on the rubric. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WrwgHkgDWGLUyMYirWZA6_ub0jChDikxoZO4lfeK3xU/edit#gid=0 | |||
| 6 | Wrap-up and next steps | Review actions & assignments | 11:25-11:30 am | Beth will notify us if the June 8th meeting is canceled. | |||
| 7 | Parking Lot | Capture important topics for future discussion |
...