Versions Compared

Old Version 4

changes.mady.by.user Elizabeth Miraglia

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Elizabeth Rodriguez

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Page Properties
label

Status

Status
colourGreen
titleDECIDED

Scope

Go-live

Description

Decide how campus bibliographic, holdings, and items record for RLF resources should migrate

Decision

See below

Owning group

PPC

Approver

PPC

Stakeholders

R = PPC
A = RMFG, FFG, Discovery FG
C = RLF task force, ASELG, Special Collections CKG
I = ICs, RLF task force, RMFG

Decision-making process

Representatives from RMFG, FFG and Discovery will develop testing scenarios and consult with the RLF task force to draft a recommendation for when/if/how campuses should suppress or remove their RLF records for cutover.

Priority

Due date

?

Recommendation

General collections:

...

Action

Status

Date

Notes

“Supergroup” with RLF Task Force, FFG, Discovery, ASELG, Spec. Coll. CKG and RMFG reps meeting to finalize recommendations

Done

4-12-21

Decision drafted

Done

4-12-21

Decision brought to PPCIn progress

Done

4-16-21

Decision approved and will be communicated to ILSDC, and all-cohort

Background

(Test load) Local RLF bibliographic record migration

(Test-Go-Live) Records Retained for Items Deposited in RLFs

...

Questions to consider

Impacts on fulfillment: (Test-Go-Live) Records Retained for Items Deposited in RLFs

...