| Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions |
|---|
| 1 | STANDING ITEM) Subteam Roundup | Check-in on OSTs - capture any shared issues or cross-team task | 10 | Team | RM - met with CDL folks working on new ETD process. Disc: Voted to use all consortium round 1 Primo 2024 enhancements votes for 8970: Consolidate My Library Card display of loans/requests from all institutions in the network Plan to get back to the Exclude eBooks from CDI results next time Might discuss accessibility quick fixes on April 19. In steering committee: Started thinking about timeline for voting for vice-chair and what organization we want to do prior to the new fiscal year RS transitioning down the list of the workplan and adding items for LUO handling and next step Tipasa. Activating Peer-to-peer preparation .
|
|
|
| 2 | Questions from Slack | FYI on anything quick that came up | 5 | Team | | | |
| 3 | OT / LG updates | Inform on salient issues from OT and LG | 5 | Jackie | Leadership Group Drafting charge for SILS Patron Privacy and Data Security Team (PPDS) and proposing members. Hardest is finding campus privacy officers as the 2 we had are no longer available (UCLA, UCB) Finalizing SILS Newsletter Cancelled next meeting (3/29)
Operations Team Organizational name change post mortem Paused Signature Success Program update – paused until after negotiations OT SC working on revising the SILS Membership Transition charge (mostly the roster)
| | |
| 4 | Around the table conversation | Explore topics of interest to the group | 20 | Team | RSOST: we’re thinking about making changes in the area of… Issue in the AFN process (UC to UC) as well as VDX - the barcodes get confusing particularly for users. When a User can’t tell which barcode to use (if it’s a new student at circ desk or patron at self-checkout) they are supposed to use the RLF barcode for AFN). Within RS community, we might be thinking to apply some sticky tape over the institution barcode, but looking at it on an ongoing problem - who would we ask to think about this? Physical handlers: it gets prepared at the INST, it goes to the NRLF for accessioning, and then it gets handled at the ILL borrowing office. Who is a deciding body for JG (UCB): I have concerns about the physical work being done in terms of manual work for whoever ends up doing it. But I also hear you about the problems ILL is having at the endpoint. The barcodes are being left on the books for historical reasons…. Can RSOST decide to put tape on at their point of touch? Can we have the depositing inst do something upstream? A subgroup of RSOST and FF and Ellen and Jon from RLFs will meet and will be designated group to make a recommendation → decision page. RSOST will bring something up with OT when there’s a there there.
| | |
| 5 | Wrap up | Review actions and decisions | 5 | Team | | | |
| 6 | Parking Lot | Capture important topics for future discussion | 5 | | | | |
| 7 | | Total | 50 minutes | | | | |