Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Next »

Date

, 10am-11:30am

Attendees

  • Lisa Ngo, UC Berkeley

  • Jared Campbell, UC Davis

  • Ellen Augustiniak, UC Irvine [Today’s Notetaker]

  • Sharon Shafer, UC Los Angeles

  • Michael Yonezawa, UC Riverside

  • Heather Smedberg, UC San Diego

  • Josephine Tan, UC San Francisco (co-chair)

  • Jess Waggoner, UC Santa Cruz (co-chair) [Today’s Timekeeper]

  • Sarah Houghton, California Digital Library

  • Chizu Morihara, UC Santa Barbara

Not attending

  • Elizabeth Salmon, UC Merced

Discussion items

DISCOVERY VISION: We strive to design and implement the best possible discovery and delivery experience for our end users using data-driven decision making. We envision a network zone experience that will allow users to discover library materials across UC collections without sacrificing relevant results. As such, the default search and results interface should prioritize the success of typical users while providing additional functionality for more advanced users.

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

Updates from other SILS groups

Share relevant items

5 min

Jess

PPC/All Chairs:

  • RMFG has developed a collaborative workflow testing document that indicates impacted groups - but they will continue to reach out directly when seeking consultation

  • Who will name automated fulfillment network? Decided this was Discovery’s role. Basically this applies to labeling of “Resource Sharing” within Primo UI

  • Concerns about workload implications if we go with Fully Flexible CDI

2

RLF Records

15 min

All

  • Fulfillment FG has recommended suppressing local holdings for RLF records

  • RMFG is asking DFG:

    • Do you think that users benefit from being able to do these kinds of title-level searches for items that would otherwise only be searchable at the journal/series level?

    • If so, is it preferable for us to suppress our holdings and include some kind of note to direct users to search for the main series for UCSD items? There are times where the item is available at another campus and so they might just as easily get it that way without having to request the RLF copy.

3

UC-eLinks

Vote on decision

20 min

All

4

Revised branding decision for Go Live

Discuss and move toward a decision

30 min

All

5

Check Ins

Discuss updates/problems/testing

15 min

All

Opportunity to check in on local implementation:

  • Worldcat

  • Boosting

  • Other

6

Next Meeting

Prep for next meeting

  • Branding decision vote?

  • Follow up on sub-group work

7

Parking Lot/Q&A

Save these issues for future discussion & comments

 

 

  • FRBR/Boosting

  • Main Menu (pull up config workbooks)

  • Facets

  • Libguides

  • Testing plan

  • Delivery and Fulfillment

  • Minimum Viable Product

  • WorldCat

  • Ebook ILL lending as it relates to discovery and limiting to availability.

  • UC-eLinks (re)naming

  • What will help links be called and where will they be in the interface?

Questions/comments:

  • SFX Journal Search Tool (moved notes to UC eLinks section)

  • Third party integrations

    • Browzine & LibKey

  • Ebook ILL lending: problematic with Melvyl; keep in mind to test in Test phase

  • No labels