Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Next »

Attendees

  • Mark Marrow (UC Berkeley)

  • Antonio Navarro (UC Davis)

  • Lai Arakawa (UC Irvine)

  • Sandra Farfan-Gracia (UC Los Angeles)

  • Ross Anastos (UC Merced)

  • Sahra Klawitter (UC Riverside)

  • Michelle Vogelsang (UC San Diego)

  • Eric Peterson (UC San Francisco)

  • Marti Kallal (UC Santa Barbara)

  • Nicole Thomas (UC Santa Cruz)

  • Alison Ray (CDL)

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions/notes

Actions

1

General Check-In

5

All

2

Bursar integration/export

Investigate/inquire how UCSC & UCD export fees to bursar

10-15?

Sahra/Antonio?/Nicole?

Follow up on the UC Consortial Block Decision for 04/05 blocks.

UCSC & UCD export fees to bursar, causing balances to zero out. is there a way to generate a report that is not tied to fine/fee balances? The goal is for Libraries to have local control over 04 or 05 blocks and if something is kicked out to the bursar’s office, it adds another layer of complexity and time) into the process.

Notes from last meeting:

UCSC doesn’t block people because of fines. Would rather just have the patron reach out about returning/replacing a block. Once the process goes to the bursar’s office, the Library is out of picture.

Action items from last meeting:

  • UCSC will inquire about what happens on the AFN if a patron is blocked (or unblocked but still has business with the bursar). See email ->

  • UCD haven't had a chance to sit down with billing coordinator yet. Will hopefully get something in writing for next week.

Email from Nicole @ UCSC:

It was settled that since we care more about the return of books rather than fines payment that we would keep all fines and fees listed on network user accounts in order for home institutions to place blocks on accounts. This is a change from what we currently do/have done in the past which was to use bill posting as the event that would get the patrons attention.

With that being said, we are still working out the finer points of how to proceed if a patron actually cannot return an item and needs to pay the fine through the bursar's office rather than return items.

Email from Antonio @ UCD:

I spoke with our Billing Supervisor and clarified our current block / billing process:

 

  1. As mentioned before, fines / fees are zeroed out once they are exported to the bursar’s office. We do not add them back onto the account.

  2. Network and non-affiliate users are billed through our Library Finance department. These bills are paid directly to the campus cashier’s office.

  3. We only block borrowers for Overdue Recalls. However, these blocks fall off once fines / fees export to the bursar and we do not add them back on.

 

3

Expired network user records

UCR student was trying to loan an AFN item from UCLA. The UCLA stub account was expired which prevented them from loaning the UCLA book at UCR.

n/a

All

Action Items from last time:

  • Each campus will verify that Patron Role expiration field is be blank.

Not sure if any discussion is needed?

4

Schedule E reporting

  • What reports are people using?

  • How have you had to modify them?

20?

All

Merced uses “Count of Items Loaned by Patron Type” found in the analytic catalog Shared Folders>Alma>Fulfillment>Reports and edits it. Added a filter for Physical Item Details - Item Policy (to remove room keys, white board markers, etc); and filtered the Loan Date to begin July 1 and end June 30 (to capture whichever FY we’re looking at); when we run the report we remove “network” and use the total.

5

Offline Circulation Tool

  • Are you using it?

  • How do you like it?

15 (could probably push to next meeting if needed)

All

6

Fulfillment Work Plan

Ongoing review and update as needed.

Link here.

5

Ross

Housekeeping

7

Wrap up/Topics for next time

5

All

  • No labels