Date
11AM-12PM (may go a little over today)
Zoom:
See calendar item or inquire with Chair for Zoom details.
Attendees
Mark Hemhauser (Unlicensed) , UC Berkeley (timekeeper)
Lisa Spagnolo , UC Davis (chair)
Paula Pascual , UC Irvine (notetaker)
Stacy McKenna , UCLA (will be late if attending)
Sarah Sheets , UC Merced
Carla Arbagey , UC Riverside
Judy Keys , UC San Diego
Lisa Wong , UC Santa Cruz
Holly Eggleston (Unlicensed) , California Digital Library
Susan Boone , UC San Francisco
Maricel Cruz (Unlicensed) , UC Santa Barbara
Not attending
Future agenda items
Discussion items
Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Assemble | Getting settled, reviewing agenda, confirming notetaker and timekeeper. | 5 | Lisa | 4/15: Will “flip-flop” roles rather than stagger. This means week 1 note taker becomes week 2 timekeeper and week 1 timekeeper becomes week 2 notetaker. (vs. the flip-flop happening the second time through the roster). |
| |
| 2 | Review of Slack-inserted documents from Caitlin and items from last meeting | 5 | Lisa | Copy of charge in our Acq/ERM folder Copy of Harmonization Principles (link to Drive Folder level) - we reviewed on 4/15 call. Team Charter: calling it done for now, but open to add any other thoughts. | |||
| 3 | Taking Temperature Survey | Briefly review this action item and share initial thoughts. Can review more for 4/29 and after premortem calls. | 5-10 | Lisa/All (any initial thoughts) | Group members who have not filled out the form should wait until Lisa Spagnolo fixes/re-sends survey | ||
| 4 | Updates: specifically from PPC | Focusing on Critical Issues document - introduction | 10 | Lisa | From PPC: “What is your vision for your Functional Area?” Not immediately jumping to HOW - before we go there, we need to figure out what, why, and why now? FG Notes: This is the beginning of discussion of role of this FG in preparing policy and procedures at the consortium level. | ||
| 5 | Discussion of Critical Issues Document | Critical Issues document discussion: assessing appropriateness for our FG, assessing urgency level, explores types of next steps how we will use project mechanisms at our disposal (will continue for 4/29) | 25-30 | All | Copy of Acq/ERM identified items in FG folder. Note: this is a discussion piece at the moment for our FG vs. inputting. | ||
| 6 | Wrap-up | Identify next actions | 5 | Lisa | |||
| 7 | Parking Lot | To save for future discussion | 60/60 |