Date
11AM-12PM (may go a little over today)
Zoom:
See calendar item or inquire with Chair for Zoom details.
Attendees
Mark Hemhauser (Unlicensed) , UC Berkeley (timekeeper)
Lisa Spagnolo , UC Davis (chair)
Paula Pascual , UC Irvine (notetaker)
Stacy McKenna , UCLA (will be late if attending)
Sarah Sheets , UC Merced
Carla Arbagey , UC Riverside
Judy Keys , UC San Diego
Lisa Wong , UC Santa Cruz
Holly Eggleston (Unlicensed) , California Digital Library
Susan Boone , UC San Francisco
Maricel Cruz (Unlicensed) , UC Santa Barbara
Not attending
Future agenda items
Discussion items
Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Assemble | Getting settled, reviewing agenda, confirming notetaker and timekeeper. | 5 | Lisa | 4/15: Will “flip-flop” roles rather than stagger. This means week 1 note taker becomes week 2 timekeeper and week 1 timekeeper becomes week 2 notetaker. (vs. the flip-flop happening the second time through the roster). |
| |
| 2 | Review of Slack-inserted documents from Caitlin and items from last meeting | 5 | Lisa | Copy of charge in our Acq/ERM folder Copy of Harmonization Principles (link to Drive Folder level) - we reviewed on 4/15 call. Team Charter: calling it done for now, but open to add any other thoughts. | |||
| 3 | Taking Temperature Survey | Briefly review this action item and share initial thoughts. Can review more for 4/29 and after premortem calls. | 5-10 | Lisa/All (any initial thoughts) | Group members who have not filled out the form should wait until Lisa Spagnolo fixes/re-sends survey | ||
| 4 | Updates: specifically from PPC | Focusing on Critical Issues document - introduction | 10 | Lisa | From PPC: “What is your vision for your Functional Area?” Not immediately jumping to HOW - before we go there, we need to figure out what, why, and why now? FG Notes: This is the beginning of discussion of role of this FG in preparing policy and procedures at the consortium level. | For consideration: Which of the critical issues do we take up first? How do we operationalize work groups? Which decisions need to be made for the Vanguard groups? How do we utilize expertise of current Alma/Primo VE campuses? Are there issues that can be worked on concurrently? How do we communicate issues/procedures that need input from various FGs? | |
| 5 | Discussion of Critical Issues Document | Critical Issues document discussion: assessing appropriateness for our FG, assessing urgency level, explores types of next steps how we will use project mechanisms at our disposal (will continue for 4/29) | 25-30 | All | Copy of Acq/ERM identified items in FG folder. Note: this is a discussion piece at the moment for our FG vs. inputting. | Lisa Spagnolo will take concerns to PPC meeting on | |
| 6 | Wrap-up | Identify next actions | 5 | Lisa | ACQ/ERM FG members will think about:
| ||
| 7 | Parking Lot | To save for future discussion | 60/60 |