Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 10 Next »

Objective: State the purpose of the group in 25 words or less (brief, energizing). 

Ensure via assessment, feedback and consultation that the SILS phase 4 governance structure is successful and develop a sustainable phase 5 gov model within UCLAS.

Roles: What are the duties needed to get the work done? Who will take notes? Who will keep meetings on track/time? Who is responsible for tracking actions?

Co-chairs:

  • Develop meeting agendas (SGTF steering calls are scheduled a week in advance of the TF meetings)

  • Facilitate decision-making and confirm task force decisions

  • Liaise and communicate with the SILS Working Group

  • ?

Task Force members:

  • Actively participate in meetings (review minutes/zoom recording if/when absent)

  • Actively participate in subgroups

  • Actively engage local SILS cohort members to gather feedback to inform operational shared governance

  • Contribute to group decision making, final report and other deliverables, including work outside of meetings

Staff (dww):

  • Manage minutes and track decision and action items

  • Participate in steering calls and support agenda development

  • Assist with development and management of the work plan and deliverables

  • Contribute to and support document/deliverable development

Staff (KB):

  • Polls and schedules SGTF meetings

What are our expectations for working together? Create a list of statements that the team agrees to uphold. For example, ask yourself: How do we make this group a safe space for transparent discussion (knowing that it might become contentious, and avoid back-channeling)? What are our ground rules for meetings? How do we ensure everyone is engaged? How do we ensure everyone has a voice? How will we resolve disagreements?

  • We actively listen to each other with an open mind and aim for mutual understanding

  • We approach discussion with creativity

  • We actively participate in a spirit of collaboration

  • We are respectful in our disagreements

  • We support decisions once they are collectively made

  • No labels