Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 9 Next »

Attendees

Not attending

Facilitator: Beth C
Notetaker: Sara Davidson Squibb (Unlicensed)
Time Keeper: Micquel Little (Unlicensed)

Discussion items

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

Welcome

Catch-up and gathering together

10:00-10:04 am

all

Rose/thorn: brief round-robin of something that made you smile, and/or something that is a bit of thorn. Voluntary.



2

Record zoom session

shared decision

10:05

Team agrees to record meetings.

Beth C will add this to our Google drive for future reference.

3

ExL Q+A session


10:06-11:00 am


This ExLibris document was reference several times re: records in IZ and NZ. See pages 8, 11, 36, 41.

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1XprzWYKURDRmUptWGid9VtS1gum-aLj8

UC Libraries will need to make decisions about scoping and whether or not these decisions are left to each campus.

SUNY system appears to use different scopes at different institutions. e.g. Buffalo

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1XprzWYKURDRmUptWGid9VtS1gum-aLj8

4

Announcements/Questions

  • Need a co-chair, pleeease!

11:01-11:05 am

Rikke has volunteered.

Rikke is co-chair.

5

Decision Making Rubric for PSELG draft

Discussion. Accept as final or continue revisions

11:05-11:25 am

Intended to use with documents we received. We anticipate that documents may include more than one option/pathway forward.

Add information on ensuring that SILS groups have been consulted. This is different from Line 19.

Discussed ways in which there could be short-term pain but long term benefits. Retain both 24 & 25.

Discussion regarding how failure might be defined. Failure could be influenced by lack of bandwidth.

Noted that all options coming to this group may have both benefits and challenges.

Option viability could also be influenced by who has to incur the costs.

Some discussion of Benefit/Risk matrix.

Edits & Additions

New, Line 13: Add information on consultations with SILS groups.

Edit, Line 25: Ask individuals to define failure in Notes.

New, Line 38: Address if there are ways to address challenges for X option.

New, Lines 42 & 43: Call out if costs are incurred by a single campus or by UC Libraries.

Edit, Line 55: Level of PSELG support, clarified “group support”

Members feel free to make comments on the rubric. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WrwgHkgDWGLUyMYirWZA6_ub0jChDikxoZO4lfeK3xU/edit#gid=0

6

Wrap-up and next steps

Review actions & assignments

11:25-11:30 am

Beth will notify us if the June 8th meeting is cancelled.

7

Parking Lot

Capture important topics for future discussion

Future agenda items

  • No labels