Legend: NOT STARTED IN PROGRESS STALLED DECIDED
Status | NOT STARTED |
|---|---|
Scope | IMPLEMENTATION |
Description | How will UC Libraries brand the Primo VE instances, the IZs and the NZ? |
Decision |
|
Owning group | Discovery FG + Josephine Tan |
Approver | CoUL |
Stakeholders | R = Discovery FG |
Decision-making process | Discovery FG will review branding options based on the experiences of recently migrated campuses, UX data, and other existing or new data about discovery system branding and best practices. |
Priority | High |
Due date | December 2020 |
Recommendation
Reasoning
Background
The SILS Working Group was charged in phase 4 to “Consider systemwide/shared branding of the SILS and when changes should be made (i.e. before or after implementation)”. The Working Group is charging the Discovery FG with Primo VE branding.
Proposal: Discovery FG should make a recommendation on Primo VE branding for the UC Libraries based on evidence (stakeholder interviews, etc.
Working assumptions:
SILS is the name of the overall service (includes Alma, Primo, etc.) and that doesn’t change.
Melvyl as a name/brand should be retired. CoUL has agreed to this.
It would be helpful to gather lessons learned from the 5 campuses who already migrated and made decisions about their Primo.
Alma is not in scope for branding since it’s a back-end tool.
Dependencies
None
Questions to consider
What do we call Primo?
What does it look like (design, colors)?
Will the name/design be the same for every campus and the NZ, or will each campus make its own decisions?
What additional branding options does Primo allow for?
Action Log
Action/Point Person | Expected Completion Date | Notes | Status |
|---|---|---|---|