Legend: NOT STARTED IN PROGRESS STALLED DECIDED
Status | NOT STARTED |
|---|---|
Scope | IMPLEMENTATION |
Description | How will UC Libraries brand the Primo VE instances, the IZs and the NZ? |
Decision |
|
Owning group | Discovery FG + Josephine Tan |
Approver | CoUL |
Stakeholders | R = Discovery FG |
Decision-making process | Discovery FG will review branding options based on the experiences of recently migrated campuses, UX data, and other existing or new data about discovery system branding and best practices. |
Priority | High |
Due date | December 2020 |
Recommendation
Reasoning
Background
The SILS Working Group was charged in phase 4 to “Consider systemwide/shared branding of the SILS and when changes should be made (i.e. before or after implementation)”. The Working Group is charging the Discovery FG with Primo VE branding.
Proposal: Discovery FG should make a recommendation on Primo VE branding for the UC Libraries based on evidence (stakeholder interviews, etc.
Working assumptions:
SILS is the name of the overall service (includes Alma, Primo, etc.) and that doesn’t change.
Melvyl as a name/brand should be retired. CoUL has agreed to this.
It would be helpful to gather lessons learned from the 5 campuses who already migrated and made decisions about their Primo.
Alma is not in scope for branding since it’s a back-end tool.
Dependencies
None
Questions to consider
What do we call Primo?
What does it look like (design, colors)?
Will the name/design be the same for every campus and the NZ, or will each campus make its own decisions?
What additional branding options does Primo allow for?
What accessibility factors should be considered?
Action Log
Action/Point Person | Expected Completion Date | Notes | Status |
|---|---|---|---|