Legend: NOT STARTED IN PROGRESS STALLED DECIDED
Recommendation
Reasoning
Background
The SILS Working Group was charged in phase 4 to “Consider systemwide/shared branding of the SILS and when changes should be made (i.e. before or after implementation)”. The Working Group is charging the Discovery FG with Primo VE branding.
Proposal: Discovery FG should make a recommendation on Primo VE branding for the UC Libraries based on evidence (stakeholder interviews, etc.)
Working assumptions:
SILS is the name of the overall service (includes Alma, Primo, etc.) and that doesn’t change.
Melvyl as a name/brand should be retired. CoUL has agreed to this.
It would be helpful to gather lessons learned from the 5 campuses who already migrated and made decisions about their Primo.
Alma is not in scope for branding since it’s a back-end tool.
Determining the default view (NZ view or IZ view) is not in scope for branding
Dependencies
Understand dependencies – are there any? Or can this decision be made anytime before go-live?
Questions to consider
What do we call Primo?
What does it look like (design, colors)?
Will the name/design be the same for every campus and the NZ, or will each campus make its own decisions?
What additional branding options does Primo allow for?
What accessibility factors should be considered, e.g., color contrast?
Action Log
Action/Point Person | Expected Completion Date | Notes | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Create three subcommittees to explore Primo VE user interfaces and best practices | Subcommittees:
| Complete | |