Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Page History
« Previous
Version 2
Next »
Attendees
Erica Zhang (co-chair)
Carla Arbagey (co-chair)
Yoko Kudo
Jared Campbell
Rebecca Culbertson
Nicole Arnold
Regrets: Lisa Mackinder
| Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions |
---|
1 | Gather & Announcements | Assemble as a group and share info | 5 | Team | Interim report sent to OT 8/1/2023 | | |
2 | Work plan goal discussion: Provide recommendations for models of work | Compile a list of questions from our documents & discussions; decide which questions our group can answer, and which an ongoing group could tackle; decide on recommendations to propose | 45 | Carla/All | Continue with maintenance/weeding https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1AjbCCgcFJGjfOChyGyr2CK6jzWXbx0mnqVMKtCw--Nw/edit Compilation of our work so far on maintenance/weeding: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vGayL-SncET93mJ0pfyRAgJVMkCBWV1bOkFUCFSrA4E/edit Finalize link maintenance, Discuss metadata maintenance Notes: How should we handle links that seem unstable? Balance relevance of resource with maintenance workload Is it cataloger's job to find new links? Best practice can involve a short time to investigate, and then submit to CDL helpline
| | |
3 | Report back from SILS groups | Understand what other SILS groups and campuses are doing in relation to OA | | All | | Note in our workflow documentation that there are groups of free/OA materials it would not cover, such as ETDs, gov docs, etc. 2023 ACRL Technical Services Interest Group meeting - some interesting presentations related to assessment of OA resources | |
4 | Wrap up & Homework | Review actions and decisions | | Team | | | |
5 | Parking Lot | Capture important topics for future discussion | | Team | How to find items that are OA but have slipped thru the cracks, not being labeled OA? Something coming from Discovery group Another area is to rethink JSC and whether they want to continue approval role. Considering ongoing maintenance of OA in Alma/Primo - who is responsible? Statistics/Resource Management as related to the workflow Related to CZ Updates Task List: Consider a cleanup project to compile a list of open access collections in the IZ that are already activated in the NZ. Deactivate and delete those collections from the IZ. This would help with maintenance since we would not have to sift through redundant data if we decided to use the CZ updates task list. Solving the missing OA links issue: determine what is within our scope: From Becky: UCSD’s Serials Cataloging Group has the following info as to how UCSD is handling this. Please read the following especially the Content Corner Update: “Are we doing anything with the Community Zone Updates Task List at the moment? When a portfolio is deleted from a community-managed CZ collection, the IZ copy of the portfolio is deactivated and unlinked from the CZ and becomes a "local" portfolio. We currently have no way of being notified of these changes except via targeted periodic sweeps. Using the CZ updates task list would give us a list of updates that directly affect our resources. Who would review the updates, how often, etc.? Who would take care of cleanup?”
a. Content corner: 2022 Alma CKB Release Notes: September-December b. Who would review the list of the updates and do the cleanup? TBD.
| | |
6 | | Total | 60/60 | | | | |