2023-08-21 10 am AASA-PT Meeting Notes

Attendees

  • CDL @Daisy Nip

  • CDL @Danielle Westbrook

  • CDL @Gem Stone-Logan

  • Berkeley: @Chan Li (Steering Committee)

  • Davis: @Alison Lanius

  • Irvine: @Ellen Augustiniak (Steering Committee)

  • LA: @John Riemer

  • Merced:@Sarah Sheets

  • Riverside:@Michele Potter (Steering Committee)

  • Santa Barbara: @akshayagrawal

  • Santa Cruz:@Lisa Wong

  • San Francisco: @Susan Boone

Regrets

  • San Diego: @Heather Hernandez (Unlicensed)

Item & Desired Outcome

Time & Facilitator

Notes

Decisions

 

Item & Desired Outcome

Time & Facilitator

Notes

Decisions

 

1

Record

Review previous notes and tasks

5m - Ellen

 



 

2

Title counts - Process for making decision

30m - @Ellen Augustiniak and guests (Mark Hemhauser, @Adam Baron )

Resource Management input

  • There are several approaches regarding how to generate title counts for third-party reporting. Current approach in the Prototype uses Normalized title, which is in alignment with ARL and ACRL reporting expectations. See decision page for https://uc-sils.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/AASAPT/pages/2221965326

  • Could run by MMSID, Normalized Title or Normalized Title + other criteria. Each approach has pros/cons through discussion, hope to reach consensus as a group.

  • RM/expert input (UCB) --- There are challenges with using Normalized title to de-dup; additional variables can be brought in, but it increases the complexity of the query and still yields imperfect results. Accounting for all of the potential variables is impossible - won’t ever be truly accurate (the approach will dedup items that should remain distinct in the count; and it won’t dedup items that are true duplicates).

    • RM experts have been focusing on MMSID; cataloguing using the same record.

    • Problems do arise with eResources (provide access through CZ, OCLC records, etc.), which negatively impacts title counts. Again - will have accuracy issues.

  • Nothing will be truly accurate; use of MMSID is consistent and simplified approach (not relying on many potential variables).

  • Additional feedback

    • Normalized title doesn’t handle print and microform items that are connected.

    • Vendor supplied records (non-OCLC, non-provider neutral); particularly for affiliate libraries, there is significant overcounting.

    • Some campuses are reloading locally what’s already been loaded by SCP into the NZ.

    • At present, Alma Analytics will not permit us to do title level reporting for each campus that accounts for IZ holdings and NZ access.

    • There is some intentional duplication, for local and systemwide record management. We know quality of vendor records varies and there are inconsistencies across portfolios.

    • Resource Management and SCP are also already looking into specific examples of known duplication, to address that.

  • Gut check: MMSID is easiest/most consistent. Acknowledge duplication - which can be significant for affiliates and other local perspectives.

    • For eR, title count is more so (or more often) a record count.

Decision: Let’s pursue MMSID for the UCL/UCOP prototype.

 

@Ellen Augustiniak will update the applicable decision page to reflect this discussion and change to MMSID. Ellen will also consider potential scope for the extent to which affiliates might need a different approach for isolating title-level counts (to determine whether there are two tracks for title-level reporting: MMSID for systemwide approach; Normalized Title, for smaller affiliates with many vendor records).
@Daisy Nip will update title-level reporting to use distinct MMSID. This will still be part of v8.
3

Next iteration of the Team

10m - @Ellen Augustiniak

  • Ellen will need to cycle off the AASA-PT; new chair is needed for next phase.

  • AASA-PT Steering is revising/extending the AASA-PT charge (a new phase of work; but not entirely re-establishing the team).

Decision: Let’s transition to a bi-weekly meeting (due to holidays, next meeting is Sept. 11)

Decision: Everyone will consider serving as chair or in a steering/leadership position.

@Ellen Augustiniak will resend the calendar invite, changing to bi-weekly.

 

4

Wrap up - Review actions and decisions

1m @Danielle Westbrook

 

 

 

5

Parking Lot - Capture important topics for future discussion

 

 

 

 

 

 

The SILS mission is to transform library services and operations through innovation and collaboration. The future is shared!
Question? Contact AskSILS-L@ucop.edu