2020-06-24 ACQ/ERM FG Meeting notes

Date

Jun 24, 2020 11AM-12:30

Zoom:

See calendar item or inquire with Chair for Zoom details.

Attendees

  • @Mark Hemhauser (Unlicensed) , UC Berkeley (timekeeper)

  • @Lisa Spagnolo , UC Davis (co-chair)

  • @Paula Pascual , UC Irvine (notetaker)

  • @Stacy McKenna , UCLA

  • @Sarah Sheets , UC Merced

  • @Carla Arbagey , UC Riverside (co-chair)

  • @Judy Keys , UC San Diego

  • @Lisa Wong , UC Santa Cruz

  • @Holly Eggleston (Unlicensed) , California Digital Library

  • @Susan Boone , UC San Francisco

  • @Maricel Cruz (Unlicensed) , UC Santa Barbara

Not attending

Future agenda items

Discussion items

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

Assemble

Getting settled, reviewing agenda

5

Lisa

 





2

Admin Items

  • Confirming roles for this meeting

  • Action Item Checks

5

Lisa

 

 

 

 

 

 

ACTION: All provide feedback as you have it, on the questions spreadsheet- https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1PCI96ZCC9AxsvLlOe_if1h-lOFIT1Y6Dl5C8eol0Qf4/edit#gid=0 [Lisa will also start to review past documents to gather up open questions.]

3

Updates: specifically from PPC

Shared understanding of PPC activities, including what is routing to our FG.

10

Lisa

 

 

 

ACTION: FG asked to finalize vision statements and post to wiki - Lisa S prepare for meeting review for 7/1 unless volunteer to reshape doc.
ACTION: Lisa check on details of certification process - are these materials available to us now?

 

4

Decision Page - Vendors Discussion - and Basecamp item

Finalize migration-related Vendors Decision Page (to route to IC) . Track status of Basecamp post.

20

All

Completed Decision Page Vendor Records in the Network Zone

360RM Tutorial

Sharing Vendor Info in NZ (ExL doc)

Working on: Vendor Data for Migration to Test Global Vendor File in Vanguard

  • Response from ExL re: recommendation not to share vendors in a CDL resource sharing environment

  • There will be no matching of vendors during the Vanguard migration – NZ and IZ migration in separate

  • Sharing of vendors will occur after migration if desired

  • We need to consider the cost/benefit of work needed to match campus vendor codes to a shared vendor code

 

Everyone: continue to look at vendor records in the NZ and think about answers to the questions on the decision page so we can make a decision for 6/24.
ACTION ITEM: Subgroup of Mark, Holly, and Lisa S. will finalize decision page

 

5

Decision Page on P2E

Finalizing P2E decision page for PPC review; beginning of testing plan for Vanguard.

20

All

 

Decision Page: P2E Recommendations for Vanguard

P2E Lessons Learned Google Document

Caitlin emphasizes “first best guess” for Vanguard.

  • Depending on how campuses choose to fill out P2E, data can migrated in a variety of ways

  • There will be post-migration clean-up in all scenarios

  • How to migrate CDL electronic order records without creating duplicate inventory?

  • We need to identify small batches that will migrate in different ways (w/ combined local/CDL, combined P + O, separated bibs and orders)

  • CDL is already prepping some collections to load only via SFX

 

 

@Lisa Spagnolo will review Alison’s CDL-related implementation docs in Basecamp for FG-accessible schematic of CDL data stores/workflow.
ACTION: Carla can you provide URL and correct/elaborate demo summary as needed?
@Lisa Spagnolo clarify how they migrated P+E
@Lisa Wong will check which electronic POL note fields are searchable and in Analytics
ACTION ITEM: Decision page will be modified/funneled to (Vanguard and Test Load) Preparation of Campus SCP Data
Subgroup for P2E/CDL order records attached: Lisa S., Carla, Judy, Jharina, Stacy
6

Basecamp Review

Review with FG items from Basecamp from other groups, pertinent to scope.

10

Lisa/All

  • Holdings and check-in data questions for later review by Lisa and Carla

 

 

7

Vision Document - Time Permitting

Review document for final form for Confluence presentation, or refine tasks for final review 7/1.

5

 

 

 

 

8

Wrap-up

Identify next actions

5

Lisa

Input for 7/1 meeting planning.

  • What does a fund report look like?

 

ACTION ITEM: @Lisa Spagnolo will display data from Davis.
9

Parking Lot

To save for future discussion (after 6/3 call - identify what to bring in next)

80/80

 

  • From 4/29: POL #s/vendor IDs unique - need to figure out how to not conflict on importing vendor/order data (after Vanguard)

  • Note that other items from the critical decisions sheet have been made into rough decision pages on Google docs. Do any dovetail with current discussion?

  • Accessing fund reports & budgets is critical – we need a demo from a campus that has already migrated, but may not need a decision page.

  • SUSHI integration - CDL/NZ vs. IZ. How do credentials from CDL get migrated? What happens in consortial environment when local campuses activate CZ collections? (from 3rd party integration item 5/27)

 

 

 

The SILS mission is to transform library services and operations through innovation and collaboration. The future is shared!

Question? Contact AskSILS-L@ucop.edu