2020-10-13 Meeting notes
Date
Oct 13, 2020, 10am-11:30am
Attendees
Lisa Ngo, UC Berkeley
Jared Campbell, UC Davis
Ellen Augustiniak, UC Irvine
Sharon Shafer, UC Los Angeles
Elizabeth Salmon, UC Merced
Michael Yonezawa, UC Riverside
Heather Smedberg, UC San Diego [Today’s Notetaker]
Josephine Tan, UC San Francisco (co-chair) [Today’s Timekeeper]
Jess Waggoner, UC Santa Cruz (co-chair)
Sarah Houghton, California Digital Library
Chizu Morihara, UC Santa Barbara
Not attending
Discussion items
DISCOVERY VISION: We strive to design and implement the best possible discovery and delivery experience for our end users using data-driven decision making. We envision a network zone experience that will allow users to discover library materials across UC collections without sacrificing relevant results. As such, the default search and results interface should prioritize the success of typical users while providing additional functionality for more advanced users.
Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Updates from other SILS groups | Share relevant items | 15 min | Josephine Sarah |
|
| Any member getting certified: let your implementation coordinators expected date of certification. |
2 | Vanguard Buddies Check-in | Offer feedback and suggestions | 15 min | All |
|
| All vanguards: Share any useful local configuration decisions in the Configuration Recommendations folder in our Drive. |
3 | Discovery UX Evaluation Sub-Groups & Process | Discuss our work moving forward for Discovery UX | 30 min | All |
| Subgroups:
|
|
4 | Primo VE naming & logo | Look at examples of Primo VEs named “Library Search” | 15 min | Josephine |
|
| all: add thoughts to the Primo VE Branding examples document as we each work through our various configuration options. |
5 | Check-in: Consulting on RMFG’s next Decision Pages | See how VG feedback is going | 15 min | All | Questions from RMFG: "We did have one more question about 852 notes, which are notes in the call number fields for holdings. I’ll try to find an example for you but generally should they be displayed? For local RLF records: we’re just wondering how confusing it is for resources where the loanable copy is at an RLF but there is a record at the home campus as well. For example a title search for “the hollow needle” will bring up an SRLF copy and a UCSD copy, but the UCSD copy *is* the RLF copy, we just added our bib to Alma because it’s higher quality. We might still need to send the records through migration but it’s good to know if there are issues that need to be addressed right after migration." Discovery feedback will help them with their two decisions: | See our feedback consultation notes.
In general to keep in mind for RMFG:
|
|
6 | Homework | Prepares team for next meeting |
| All |
|
| All: View Additional Primo VE Training videos. . All: Look at ExL’s Primo VE Customization Best Practices |
7 | Parking Lot/Q&A | Save these issues for future discussion & comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Our feedback needed to provide for the RMFG’s Decisions
Decision Page | Priority vote (1-3) | Consulting group feedback due |
1 | 10/7 | |
1 | 10/13 | |
1 | 10/13 | |
1 | 10/21 | |
1 | 10/21 |
The SILS mission is to transform library services and operations through innovation and collaboration. The future is shared!
Question? Contact AskSILS-L@ucop.edu