FRBR/DEDUP Preferred Records
Legend: not started IN PROGRESS STALLED decided
Status | In Progress |
---|---|
Description | Assess current FRBR/DEDUP options and compare it to expected behavior and user needs. Determine if harmonization is required and provide guidance on the pros/cons of each option. |
Decision summary |
|
Owning group | DISC |
Approver | DISC |
Consulted | E-Resources, Resource Management |
Informed | E-Resources, Resource Management |
Priority | High |
Target decision date | Feb 24, 2023 |
Date decided |
|
Notes and links to reference documents | UCSC FRBR Group Titles https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1j4BlFs4SIIe02l1kWJz2Wa9h1O9nj6PQrF_tMq5ZPio/edit?usp=sharing |
---|---|
Related Idea Exchange Posts |
Recommendation
Describe the final recommendation/decision.
Impact
Stakeholder group | Impact |
---|---|
Who does this decision affect? [name of the group] | Explain the significance of the decision to EACH stakeholder group. How will this decision impact this particular group? What will change? Do they need to take any action? If so, when? |
|
|
|
|
Reasoning
Background
Questions:
Test Parameters
Preferred Record Configuration: Configuration → Discovery → Display Configuration → Configure Views → Select View → Brief Results
Test View: FRBR Only
Criterion | Value |
---|---|
Define FRBR display for local records | Preferred |
Enable FRBR | Yes |
Enable Dedup | No |
Criteria for FRBR preferred record | Type = Availability |
Example of ALMA-D
For each Test View Preferred Record type:
Look for a FRBRIZED title only available in print at your campus.
Look for a FRBRIZED title only available in electronic at your campus.
Look for a FRBRIZED title that's available both in print and electronic at your campus.
UCR FRBR/DEDUP Testing 09/2022
Dependencies
Questions to consider
Action Log
Action/Point Person | Expected Completion Date | Notes | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Discovery Reopens FRBR/DeDup Conversation | Jan 13, 2023 |
|
|
Initial Testing done with Pros/Cons | Jan 27, 2023 |
|
|
Complete documentation and forward to Eresource/Resource Management for review. | Feb 10, 2023 |
|
|
Review feedback and Final Decision | Feb 24, 2023 |
|
|
Discussion, thoughts, etc.
UCR is drafting an enhancement request…
Improve FRBR functionality: Precedence should be given to institution's available inventory.
As a user, we want to be able to set Available Inventory to be part of the FRBR ranking criteria when determining the FRBR preferred record in the same way it is for choosing the DEDUP preferred record.
“Availability - Precedence is given to a record that is available in a specific delivery category if it is HELD BY THE INSTITUTION: physical (ALMA-P), electronic (ALMA-E), or digital (ALMA-D).”
Currently, precedence based upon inventory can only be configured for the preferred deduplicated record, and FRBR ranking does not take an institution’s inventory into account when ranking results.
Current behavior:
When an institution has BOTH print and electronic inventory, the preferred record is based upon configuration.
When an institution only has print inventory but ALMA-E is configured as the preferred record, Primo will display an electronic record without inventory, direct users to make an interlibrary loan, and bury the print inventory in the FRBR results.
Likewise when an institution only has electronic inventory but configured ALMA-P as the preferred record.
Desired behavior:
When an institution only has print inventory, the print record with inventory is the default preferred record.
When an institution only has electronic inventory, the electronic record with inventory is the default preferred record.
When an institution has BOTH print and electronic inventory, the preferred record is based upon configuration, and access to BOTH the electronic and print inventory is displayed (Link to the electronic, call number and location for the print).
The SILS mission is to transform library services and operations through innovation and collaboration. The future is shared!
Question? Contact AskSILS-L@ucop.edu