2022-02-03 Meeting notes

Attendees

  • Sherry Lochhaas

  • Michelle Polchow, Chair

  • Jharina Pascual

  • Sarah Sheets

  • Carla Arbagey

  • Judy Keys

  • Katie Keyser

  • Natalee Bell 

  • Tamara Pilko

  • Lisa Mackinder

  • Kevin Balster

Not in attendance:

  • Tamara Pilko, Vice Chair

Meeting documents:
Slide Deck for Meeting
Recording of Meeting

 

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

Team Charter

Responsibilities:
ongoing rotation of responsibilities

 

Part III:
What are our expectations for working together?

15 min

Michelle Polchow

Carla - Note taker
Judy - Timekeeper
Katie - Action Items

 

Team Charter Document (Confluence)

Suggestion for Part III to use previous team charter wording for this section.

  • For Slack conversations that become complex, copy and paste these into an e-mail to preserve the conversation

 

2

Impact Statement on Electronic Resources Management - December 2021
From AEFG

Introduce problem statement and recommendations from AEFG

15 min

Michelle Polchow and Carla Arbagey

Documents:
Impact Statement on Electronic Resources Management - December 2021

E-Resources Workflow Legacy v. Alma

  • Discussion of using CZ records to provide immediate/easy access vs. what we decide to have fully cataloged

  • Discussion of how each campus handles discovery: most have a team that is separate from the e-resource management team

Should we request this document (or a version of this) be sent to the SILS Leadership Group?

Do we identify potentially affected positions at each campus?

  • Some campuses are experiencing staffing challenges in acq & e-res

 

3

Report on CDL Vendor/License/Acquisitions framework in support of local members processing new NZ acquisitions

Subtopics:
-- multi-series e-collections
--Factiva discovery errors

Update E-Resources Subteam

20 min

Michelle Polchow

Background documents:

Notes:

  • CSU is using Alma for centrally managed agreements and journals

  • Current CDL Acq procedure is to send a spreadsheet to campuses: example of ProQuest Black Studies Center - our current infrastructure does not connect local payments to NZ

  • Importance of the Vendor field, needs to be populated to create Analytics, but we need to have harmonized vendor records

  • Consider making a small project team from ACQ & E-res working groups

  • Goal is to have our data tied together to support cost analysis and other analytics

  • Need to share our understanding of these issues, escalate through SILS structure to operations team

@Michelle Polchow will share with the Acquisitions Working Group

@Michelle Polchow Set up a meeting with chairs & VC of both groups plus CDL rep (Lisa M.) to discuss NZ acq structure

4

Wrap Up

Review actions and decisions

5

 

 

 

 

5

Parking Lot

Capture important topics for future discussion

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

Total

x/x

 

 

 

 

 

 

The SILS mission is to transform library services and operations through innovation and collaboration. The future is shared!
Question? Contact AskSILS-L@ucop.edu