2022-07-11 Meeting notes

Owned by Ernesto Mendez (Unlicensed)
Last updated: Jul 15, 2022 by Joe Ameen
2 min read

Attendees

  • Mark Marrow (UC Berkeley)

  • Antonio Navarro (UC Davis)

  • Lai Arakawa (UC Irvine)

  • Alicia Amador (UC Los Angeles)

  • Joe Ameen (Note Taker) (UC Merced)

  • Sahra Klawitter (UC Riverside) (Absent)

  • Ernesto Mendez,  (UC San Diego)

  • Eric Peterson (UC San Francisco)

  • Phillipa Rosman (UC Santa Barbara)

  • Nicole Thomas (UC Santa Cruz)

  • Alison Ray (CDL)

 

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

General Check-In

Preliminary Questions

5

All

 

 

 

2

Work Plan: AFN Consortial User Blocks

Follow up

10

All

  • Limit Cash Testing

  • Variable Cash Limit Amounts

  • Additional testing planned

  • Communication flow Reminder & Importance

 

Cash Limit Testing:

The differences in cash limit blocks on different campuses may make it difficult to harmonize. Local harmonization may be difficult. More exploration of AFN level cash limit blocks may be necessary.

AFN Consortial Blocks:

We’ll need to make sure that all of the stakeholders are informed, as well as all relevant local groups and units that will be impacted.

 

 

 

3

Work Plan: Borrowing Privileges Harmonization

Initial look At Borrowing Privileges Information

30

All

There appear to be significant differences in loan configuration across the different campuses.

Each campus has their own stakeholders that have to be involved with or approve changes to loan limits/rules.

The group will investigate the AFN limits and see if they are impacted by the local limits.

At first look, loan limits seems to be located under user groups and not differentiated by local or AFN lending sources.

Can configure (and harmonize?) a Network loan limit?

 

 

 

Consult with Allison to see if the AFN can be configured such that there’s a network level loan limit.
4

Work Plan: Missing AFN Items

Follow up

10

All

There are a few specific examples of items having been lost in the system. This might require a document that outlines multiple situations and how we might handle them, officially.

This may include: Lost items, damaged items…

An interim solution, for damaged items, may be to not check damaged items in and instruct the patron to contact the lending library.

 

Joe and Antonio will make an attempt at creating a draft document to outline procedures for different scenarios.
5

Wrap Up

Review actions and decisions

5

 

 

 

 

6

Parking Lot

Capture important topics for future discussion

5

 

There was a discussion from Phase 4 around Reading Rooms and how that functioned in Alma. One of the campuses (UCR?) might have put in an EXL request around this. This comes into play when there are library use only resource sharing items.

 

 

Add library use only items and relevant configurations to the agenda.
7

 

Total

x/x

 

 

 

 

 

The SILS mission is to transform library services and operations through innovation and collaboration. The future is shared!
Question? Contact AskSILS-L@ucop.edu