2021-05-21 PPC Meeting notes
Attendees
@Claudia Horning (Unlicensed), Co-Chair
@Beth Callahan (Unlicensed)
@Elizabeth Miraglia
@Danelle Moon (Unlicensed)
@Elizabeth Rodriguez (Unlicensed)
@Lisa Spagnolo
@Jess Waggoner
@Caitlin Nelson
Not attending
@Josephine Tan (Unlicensed)
@Xiaoli Li , Co-Chair
@Christine Barone (Unlicensed) PM
Discussion items
Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Check-in / updates | Information sharing and problem-solving | 5 | All | RMFG: working through MVP items, making good use of our study halls DCFG: Finalizing Decision Tree/Companion Document. AEFG: Worked to complete 003 on Import Profiles (see below). Continuing discussion on remaining MVP items, which involve CDL coordination. Fulfillment and ILL: DFG: Completed Filter by Availability (CDI) guidance document for campuses, campuses are determining how they will integrate Worldcat (local decision spreadsheet), wrapping up draft decision on MARC for facet/search/display in Primo - need to consult with RMFG as next step PSELG: no report ASCELG: |
|
|
2 | Decisions | Discuss and approve proposed decisions
| 45 | Claudia |
|
|
|
3 | RMFG | Best practices documents | 15 | Liz M. | (Go-live and Beyond) Best practices for the OCLC Connexion Gateway Export Ok to keep as decision, link out to this from existing training hub doc Best practices and guidance for MARCEdit/Alma integration in a Consortium Liz will contact internal training to get this moved into the training hub |
|
|
4 | MVP - Primo VE Configuration needing Collaborative Work, including Display Logic Rules | https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fz3hEoApCzWR9PvMRA2Yc2Bpq0hkBdvPaxRgfyz8WJA/edit#gid=0 From the Primo VE workshops: what areas need additional review/collaboration for configuration? Examples: Display Logic Rules, General Electronic Services, etc. that may need discussion across functional areas including e-resources management, fulfillment, CDL for NZ-level configuration. How should these collaborative areas in Discovery be addressed? What is currently on MVP to represent this, and if needing more, how should these items be represented (& with what ownership)? | 15 | Lisa | Lisa: it’s a big issue that impacts a lot of areas and might be good to do some messaging and start thinking about next steps. Do we need a subgroup? Are there minimums that need to be in place for Day 1? Jess: recent Primo trainings have surfaced some areas that weren’t on the radar before, some might be better candidates for post go-live. Agree that a subgroup is probably a good idea Next steps: AEFG already Alma campuses document their settings and identify critical ones, then reach out to Disco and CDL |
|
|
5 | EUOS (recurring) | https://docs.google.com/document/d/19pE99m3xZKp52BJVCBElm_d4bMPCpzRQt1-cW6gf_hQ/edit Soft deadline for when decisions that affect everyone can be completed | 10 | Claudia | Continued from last meeting: RMFG: June 8 DFG: June 8 Ongoing: make sure we keep the public service components in mind as we keep making decisions. PSELG is also going to keep monitoring discussions | To be shared with ICs and EUOS |
|
6 | PM Update | Awareness of what’s happening / coming soon in the project
| 0 | Christine | For Monday project updates and office hours, feel free to skip and watch the recording later if there are no topics or if topics are not a subject of interest. Meetings:
|
| |
7 | Homework |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 | Parking Lot |
|
|
| Future meeting:
|
|
|
9 |
| TOTAL | 90/90 |
|
|
|
|
Future agenda items
The SILS mission is to transform library services and operations through innovation and collaboration. The future is shared!
Question? Contact AskSILS-L@ucop.edu