2021-09-22 meeting notes

Note taker Vermeij

Nice to see you all

0

LMW news

summarize skills

time commitment

brief description of TF

10

CM

• Important to replace that fulfillment/ILL/discovery role.

• A short description should be submitted to DOC, along with any recommendations we might have.

@Cathy Martyniak (Unlicensed) will start the DOC doc describing the need, skillset, and recommendations.

@Anna Striker will draft a thank you letter to LMW.

Scoring - the importance of how you write the questions….

Shall we invite Caitlin Nelson and Lynne G. to attend future meeting to discuss all aspects of scoring the SILS RFP so we can learn from their experiences?

5

CM and LG

• We’ll be getting a lot of information from different people; once we have it, we need to be able to analyze/score.

• Sage has experience with analyzing surveys and writing questions.

• Tendency in surveys for recency bias.

• Strawman discussion - fill in what kinds of answers we think we might get and talk through them among ourselves.

• Need to decide on which groups matter, e.g. need to be able to pull out spec. coll. data.

• Anecdotal evidence can also be important.

• We may want to start with a pro/con/unique spreadsheet for TF members to fill out.

Start with Sage and Lynne’s advice; then move on to Caitlin once we’re further along.

@Cathy Martyniak (Unlicensed) will start a spreadsheet with pros/cons/unique for each option, distribute to TF members for homework.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17WqwO3XB0YE2_qFAbTPTc7iRW6AtPHu_qH6OTkPwKu0/edit#gid=0

@S.J. Koller (Unlicensed) will prepare some talking points for next time.

Survey questions by type/answer

How to make sure that the data we get back is actionable and not just anecdotal

10

LG

• How do we determine equity between bigger and smaller campuses?

• Can average each campus’s answers.

@Lynne E. Grigsby will prep talking points for next time re: what she learned while scoring the SILS RFP

Timeline

• September-October – think through as many of the RLF/Alma issues as we can

• October-November, finalizing in early December – Question prep and vetting

• January – send out survey. Allow three weeks to fill out?

• February-March – Analyze and discuss results

• April-May – Decide on recommendation, write report

confirm or revise this timeline, based on the discussions above

what impact on frequency of our meetings?

15

All

• Not in current timeline: consulting with stakeholder groups outside of survey.

• Keep as tentative schedule but keep it loose?

• Is meeting monthly still enough?

@Cathy Martyniak (Unlicensed) will poll group about meeting schedule. (sent 9/22)

Parking Lot