2020-06-09 Meeting notes
Jun 9, 2020 03:00-04:30 PM
Zoom: contact chair for link and password
Attendees
@Belinda Egan (Unlicensed)
@Cathleen Lu
@Hermine Vermeij
@Jean Dickinson (Unlicensed)
@Latasha Means
@Martha McTear (Unlicensed)
@Sarah Wallbank (Unlicensed) (co-chair)
@Shi Deng (notes)
@TJ Kao
@Yoko Kudo
@Elizabeth Miraglia (chair)
Not attending
Discussion items
Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Updates |
| 0 mins | Liz
| Liz updated on Günter’s message and Deadline issue From Jane: TJ went UCB and showed and tell about doing analytics SCP local notes:
|
|
|
2 | Q&A debrief and some updates from basecamp |
| 15 mins |
| Liz: the setup for recording in Zoom lost the question but have audio transcripts. Sarah: pasted note of Q&A into last meeting notes.
| Liz: Would be helpful to have another one before Go-live? Yes |
|
3 | Review/update decision pages | Fist-of-five votes for potential Vanguard harmonization | 50 mins |
| Fist-of-five decision making (see page 12) Group did little exercise to get familiar with the process For each: let’s look at whether an attempt at standardization for the Vanguard is realistic and to what degree, keeping in mind that localization is always an option. Question on why to separate 9XX and non-9XX: good question to be discuss whether to consolidate or link between two decision pages Question on standardization: is decision on level of standardization, all or nothing, or have standardization of a subset: all can be decided, i.e. on which option we would decide, also we make recommendations Bibliographic records 9xx fields mapping for Vanguard According to Alma campuses,, ExL will add old system ID into 035 which is searchable. See example Belinda provided [need copy from the chat] 019 vs. 035: migration and post migration process are different. during migration, if 019/035 being matched, will not add; If 019 not matched on 035z, you may have to export; if not matched will fallout | Bibliographic records 9xx fields mapping for Vanguard Voted recommendations for 973 be used for 793 or collection titles: 9 5s and 2 4s (mainly have not discussed with local yet) Voted recommendation for campuses if plan to move current system ID, to 996, see decision page linked above. Non-9XX local data for the Vanguard Voted for added option 5 and campus will write which option used for Vanguard test that can be used to form decision post-Vanguard; Liz will send the decision page to PCC. | Bibliographic records 9xx fields mapping for Vanguard For older system IDs (not the current one), getting feedback from campuses on: one field or two preferable, if one field (996), which subfield to recommend? get feedback by next Monday. Bibliographic records to leave out of the Vanguard NZ Share and get feedback from campuses to have discussion next week Non-9XX local data for the Vanguard Share and get feedback from campuses |
4 | Sandbox time: Primo and NZ/IZ edits [if time allows]
|
| 20 mins |
| deferred |
|
|
Future agenda items
The SILS mission is to transform library services and operations through innovation and collaboration. The future is shared!
Question? Contact AskSILS-L@ucop.edu