2020-11-17 Meeting notes

Updates (please add in advance)

0 mins

All

NZ load order

Finalize the NZ load order for test load and, ideally, go-live

110 mins

SILS Principles and Framing: https://libraries.universityofcalifornia.edu/content/sils-phase-4-principles-and-shared-assumptions

Finalized criteria in the test template:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ady0y-Pj3sB-Mte77TdWy0Tbnfbz8OkzkwFOOTy0z1c/edit

Campuses present their responses to load order criteria:

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1cjIQLFzhd06N5up3cam-6M_KMXqsV5iN?usp=sharing

Let’s talk about SCP:

• One concern is that SCP hasn’t processed control number changes: would impact anyone who does have a more updated copy of a given record with additional 035 data

• SCP stands to lose their data completely since there are no local extensions for the NZ 9XX range

• We should try to help campuses minimize that clean up in advance as much as possible

• Approved SCP first

Merced:

• They have the most updated copy, small-ish collection

• Approved Merced 2nd

UCSF:

• Prefer to be last

• Smaller collection, primarily electronic

• Would benefit from records from others

• Have a good handle on local data

• Approved UCSF last

3rd:

• Heard from UCB and UCLA, common thread that UCSD is a strong contender for 3rd

• UCSD processes OCLC updates, has strong authority control, pcc participation, collection size is enough to make an impact

• Approved UCSD 3rd

4th:

• UCB: wants to go in before UCLA because they want to use the test load to learn more about their data

  • Strong support in IT department for cleanup

  • Not processing OCLC updates

  • Have largely protected local data

  • Complex collections that aren’t “special” in the strict sense

  • NRLF records tend to be high quality, staff are detail-oriented and have OCLC numbers. General sense that the NRLF campuses are happy with the records they get

• UCLA:

  • Also large database

  • Strong pcc participation

  • Processing OCLC updates for serials, hoping to start updates for monos in the new year and hopefully a large chunk before go-live

  • SRLF staff only handle items, bibs are handled by UCLA and either match a UCLA bib or keep the one sent by the campus

  • Approved UCB 4th, will need to be thoroughly reviewed for go-live

• 5th

  • UCLA, will need to be thoroughly reviewed for go-live

• 6th

  • UCD: strong PCC participation

• 7th

  • UCSC: have some history of paid record enhancements

• 8th

  • UCI: has a medical school and no strong preference of load order outside that (and not being last)

• 9th

  • UCR: has a medical school and no strong preference

• 10th

  • UCSB: no strong preference but do want to be sure they don’t accidentally create bad data for other campuses so ok going in later

See decision page