2022-11-09 RS OST meeting notes
- Alison Ray (CDL)
Attendees
@Patrick SHANNON (Unlicensed) , UC Berkeley
@Jason Newborn , UC Davis (vice chair)
@Linda Michelle Weinberger , UC Irvine
@Amador, Alicia , UC Los Angeles
@Demitra Borrero (Demitra Borrero), UC Merced;
@Sabrina Simmons , UC Riverside
@Scott Hathaway , UC Santa Barbara
@Mallory DeBartolo (Unlicensed) , UC Santa Cruz, note taker;
@Peter Devine , UC San Diego
@Ryan White , UC San Francisco
@Alison Ray (CDL) , California Digital Library (chair)
regrets:
Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | record meeting | make sure Alison records meeting | 1 | Alison |
| ||
| 2 | Review/Discuss OCLC’s Extending Tipasa Alma integration document | Identify any clarifying questions needed from document Identify any choice points to make from document Consider any next steps | ? | all |
| “API contacts” will meet again with OCLC for more clarity about “APIs” |
|
| 3 | Tipasa timeline: adding in go/nogo points | Add in 1-2 (or more??) go/nogo decision points (eg. after pilot ends) | 7ish | all |
| slotted in go/nogo dates in timeline | @Alison Ray (CDL) 1st tipasa rs ost go/nogo decision on jan 25 agenda Jan 19, 2023 |
| 4 | Tipasa Pilot temperature check | Understand how people are feeling about Tipasa so far… testing, integration, confidence
Overall temperature is cold |
| Tipasa Piloters | ILL Request transfer has been tested in R & B sbs, varying level of success some testing between sandboxes what comes through via ill request transfer?? → please send any summary of deficiencies to rs-ost-l general disappointment in ability to test (limitations in environment: supposed patron interactions, other integrations not available to test possible test (for Tipasa to Alma): complete patron account in tipasa, then Need two “ncip” profiles in Alma, one for Alma-> Tipasa, and another for the Tipasa → Alma (NCIP info & Tipasa configuration) |
|
|
| 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 | Wrap up | Review actions and decisions | 5 |
|
|
| @Alison Ray (CDL) ask on rs-ost-l about meeting nov 23 Nov 9, 2022 |
| 8 | Bike Rack | Capture important topics for future discussion |
|
| ‘pu anywhere exceptions’: review shared messages, what would be next steps is the “randomized” part of the rota building actually randomizing things? Jason has a hunch that within the geographical groups it’s creating them alphabetically. (discovered in reviewing schedule c report) NRLF/SRLF rejected stuck at B/LA follow up: SH’s ‘guide’; test with what B/LA see; more escalation with ExL (scott, Mallory, Jason, patrick) ExL’s solicitation to “contribute to the Resource Sharing Directory”. Kind of a huge thing that we should think about? (Mallory) → maybe after P2P investigation… |
|
|
| 9 |
| Total | x/x |
|
|
|
|
Related content
The SILS mission is to transform library services and operations through innovation and collaboration. The future is shared!
Question? Contact AskSILS-L@ucop.edu