2023-03-01 RS OST meeting notes

Attendees

@Patrick SHANNON (Unlicensed) , UC Berkeley
@Jason Newborn , UC Davis (vice chair)
@Amador, Alicia , UC Los Angeles
@Demitra Borrero (Demitra Borrero), UC Merced;
@Scott Hathaway , UC Santa Barbara
@Mallory DeBartolo (Unlicensed) , UC Santa Cruz, note taker;
@Peter Devine , UC San Diego
@Ryan White , UC San Francisco
@Alison Ray (CDL) , California Digital Library (chair)
@Linda Michelle Weinberger , UC Irvine
regrets: @Sabrina Simmons , UC Riverside

	Item	Desired Outcome	Time	Who	Notes	Decisions	Actions

	Item	Desired Outcome	Time	Who	Notes	Decisions	Actions
1	record meeting	make sure Alison records meeting	1	Alison
2	Discuss & Decide on Tipasa project plan outline 2023/2024	Discuss any new feedback from stakeholders, local staff note/make any changes needed to the decision page vote!	20	all		We voted! Still need Sabrina’s vote.
3	Next steps for Tipasa transition (discuss shape of ‘testing phase’)	who/what/when/etc what sort of ‘starting’ document? (charge? decision page??)	20	all	Need to create a testing doc. Charge creates structure for internal use and also provides milestones, making it so the project doesn’t slip by and defines when the project would be “at risk”. The “what” and “when” can be a little looser. Propose that testers define the testing logistics. Who (interested parties): UCR, UCB, UCI, UCSB, UCLA, CDL (as liaisoning) What: test delivery of OCLC’s fulfilment of gaps; identify any other use cases needed, aside: consider if another sb is needed (for RLF, UCLW??) When: whichever is sooner: when gaps are filled or October 2023		@Alison Ray (CDL) write charge for Tipasa Testers Mar 2, 2023 Mar 8, 2023 next meeting: Tipasa Testers meeting
4
5	Wrap up	Review actions and decisions	5
6	Bike Rack	Capture important topics for future discussion			‘pick up anywhere exceptions’: review shared messages, what would be next steps metrics on how often ‘pick up anywhere’ requests have to be changed to home campus (Jason) → may lead to: editing pu loc for this requests → may lead to: harmonizing bookbands is the “randomized” part of the rota building actually randomizing things? Jason has a hunch that within the geographical groups it’s creating them alphabetically. (discovered in reviewing schedule c report) NRLF/SRLF rejected stuck at B/LA follow up: SH’s ‘guide’; test with what B/LA see; more escalation with ExL (scott, Mallory, Jason, patrick) ExL’s solicitation to “contribute to the Resource Sharing Directory”. Kind of a huge thing that we should think about? (Mallory) → maybe after P2P investigation…
7		Total	x/x