Attendees
Jo Anne Newyear-Ramirez, UC Berkeley
Xiaoli Li, UC Davis
John Philip Renaud, UC Irvine
John Riemer, UCLA
Jim Dooley, UC Merced
Tiffany Moxham, UC Riverside
Aislinn Sotelo, UC San Diego
Lidia Uziel, UC Santa Barbara
Sarah Lindsey, UC Santa Cruz
Holly Eggleston, California Digital Library (note taker)
Michael Walmsley, California Digital Library (guest)
Not attending
Haley Mcewan, UC San Francisco
Discussion items
Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Marcive records | Review the decision page Confirm the source of the base file Decide the cost-share model Brainstorm the plan for processing monthly files | 10 mins | Review the following documents: (Test load) MARCIVE Bibliographic Records in the NZ UCSD providing records, SCP loading to NZ for Test Load only For non-backfile records | Use FTE cost share model 9 campuses (no UCSF) for MARCIVE | ALL: Please let Xiaoli know by noon Friday if OK for her to bring this decision page to PPC’s meeting Friday afternoon. Michael: Generate quote using cost breakout based on FTE cost shares (9 campus), add values to Cost Share Link. | |
| 2 | YBP/GOBI Shelf-ready services proposal | Discuss the level of services (silver or gold) Review collection pattern of each campus Discuss the cost-share models | 25 | Fill out Tab 1 and Tab 2 of this excel sheet: Campus information related to shelf-ready proposal Review Tab 3 of this excel sheet: Campus information related to shelf-ready proposal - share your ideas for how cost can be shared Possible switch/increase of electronic? This proposal only includes charge for MARC records, does not include physical processing cost. Pricing may be affected by 1. volume and 2. preference for service level 3. ratio of P to E, may gain API automation and enhanced records. Gold vs Silver = both will have OCLC number, Gold has full record cataloging. Michael can provide more information when needed. Question: Would OCLC Collection Manager update process pull higher level records? (Not sure if UC will use it). Question: How much record overlap between campuses? Next step Michael return to YBP/GOBI with additional clarification. | Michael move cost share document to YBP folder. | ||
| 3 | Update and checking | Discuss questions and upcoming milestones | 15 mins | All | November 6 - Test Load Kickoff Difference - SCP will be loading SCP only data to NZ, loading remainder to SCP IZ. |
| |
| 4 | Authority control | Discuss questions and ideas about authority control in Alma | 10 mins | John Riemer | Not discussed - move to next meeting. A meeting recently about "authorities" with ExL staff revealed that Alma has no effective way to get headings changed in word processor mode. There are a lot of headings with a name portion followed by a $t Title portion or subject subdivisions in $x,y,z, as well as corporate body main headings followed by various subunits in $b. For those, there is a real need to instruct the system to please change the portion of the heading that reads X to Y, regardless of what additional text string follows that. Add-on software in some existing systems allows that. ExL just said we should consider making an enhancement request for the future. Proposed coping strategy:
| ||
| 5 | Homework | ||||||
| 6 | Parking lot | ETD issues:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ybrtfRg-a9KbdpwmevZmyGAr3Oy4K0Nu2zc5raEtBcE/edit | |||||
| 7 | Total | 60 |
Future agenda items
Be the first to like this
Write a comment...