Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Page History
« Previous
Version 11
Next »
Attendees
Jharina Pascual, (acting vice-chair) UCI
Sarah Sheets, UCM
Katie Keyser, UCSF
Kevin Balster, UCLA
Carla Arbagey, UCR
Sherry Lochhaas, CDL
Michelle Polchow, Chair, UCD
Natalee Bell, UCSB
Jason Dezember, UCB
Sarah Lindsey, UCSC (substituting for Tamara)
Judy Keys, UCSD
Not in attendance:
Meeting documents:
Meeting Recording & Chat (link to file in Google Drive)
| Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions | |
---|
1 | Record: Michelle
Announcements | Share announcements | 5 min | | Notetaker: Judy Keys Time Keeper: Kevin Balster Actions: Natalee Bell | For access issues related to renewals, continue to use CDL Helpline; forward any vendor e-mails regarding renewals to Sherry | Steering committee to determine how to rotate notetaker/time keeper/action duties - within committee or exclude committee. | |
2 | CDLNZ-TF | Updates Should Order Button ticket go to Operational Team for ExL monthly mtg? | 5 min | Sherry Lochhaas | Order button issue - ticket has been escalated with Ex Libris, contact Gem who is the owner of the ticket Task force is a time-limited group. Still looking at hiring Ex Libris consultant for help with workflow questions. Order records and Analytics reports in Alma may not be able to fully replace the recharge reports currently produced; procedures are still a work in progress. Campus testing feedback has been useful, but not advising that anybody create order records off of NZ bibs or inventory at this time. CDL is not currently in a position to keep campuses up to date with details of every change of bib/collection/etc in the NZ, which would affect campuses using NZ inventory for orders. As task force rolls off, Acq & E-res ops groups may begin to have joint meetings (possibly monthly or bimonthly in the Acq Monday 1-2 time slot?)
| | | |
3 | Helpline Update | Updates | 5 min | Sherry Lochhaas | Email sent out this week | Send questions to Sherry | - Michelle Polchow to debate survey on what systems each campus uses to track tickets.
| |
4 | Discovery Work plan - CDI Limit by Availability | Comments - ERES consider all possible settings? https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Alma/Product_Documentation/010Alma_Online_Help_(English)/040Resource_Management/080Configuring_Resource_Management | 10 min | Michelle Polchow | CDI Limit by Availability [Phase 4 delegated] Keep Easy Active setting in mind when troubleshooting Local settings can be changed / be aware of these settings when we are troubleshooting as a group Need to make sure librarians & public service staff understand the implications of these options (and are made aware of any changes)
| | | |
5 | Idea Exchange - All-Chairs needs input from all Subteams “Ability to run Analytics reports on Alma Configuration settings” | Review UCSC suggested recommendations - agree or modify our vote based on these suggestions UCSC has submitted recommendations | 15 min | Michelle Polchow | https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Alma/Product_Documentation/010Alma_Online_Help_(English)/050Administration/050Configuring_General_Alma_Functions/210Alma_Code_Table_Reference How should we vote on this item? Which group would benefit the most - fulfillment, acquisitions, etc.? License settings would be useful for our group Discussion o the UCSC recommendations list: advocating for licensing terms, related records, online services order
| Our group voted to support licensing terms, related records, online services order | ERES (Michelle Polchow Jason Dezember Judy Keys Katie Keyser Kevin Balster Natalee Bell Paula Pascual Sherry Lochhaas Tamara Pilko) | |
6 | Feedback for OARM-PT | Request comment on defining OA - reminder to read for discussion at next meeting | | | Background: Open Access Resource Management Task Force in their Phase 2 Report Current definition: https://cdlib.org/services/collections/licensed/policy/open-access-resources-at-the-uc-libraries/ Requesting feedback on our draft document here The following questions may help guide your feedback: Does the definition of OA generally align with UC Libraries’ understanding/expectations of what might be labeled as OA in UCLS? Do the definition and evaluation criteria allow for inclusion of too much content, or are they prohibitive? Is there any other feedback you would like to share about this draft document?
| | | |
7 | Work Plan prioritization | Review survey responses | | | https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1KVHVZ3mxeTQJhAAhLarkxvRAXtD25uC8u15KjDdnE54/edit#responses Top priorities include: perpetual rights tracking, authentication/authorization protocols, space to discuss local e-resource practices, multi-series electronic collection level request Sharing of e-resource licensing information across campuses was the least priority
| | | |
8 | Workplan Items Prioritization SWOT for ERES strengths weaknesses opportunities threats
| Notes left here from prior meetings Planning + Prioritization | 15 | Paula Pascual | Ongoing notes: | | - Paula Pascual Check with Sherry/CDL about multi-series e-collection level records and sharing of license info
- Sherry Lochhaas to take back to the group to discuss further.
- Team to review priorities and review next week.
- Michelle Polchow to send out survey on priorities.
| |
9 | Items of Concern | Information Sharing | 10 | All | | | | |
10 | Wrap Up | Review actions and decisions | 3 min | | | | | |
11 | Parking Lot | Capture important topics for future discussion: | | |
| | | |
12 | | Total | 60/60 | | | | | |