Attendees
Stacy McKenna (UCLA)
Erika Quintana (UCR)
Judy Keys (UCSD)
vacant (UCSC)
Maricel Cruz (UCSB)
Osman Celik (UCB)
Laura Fouladi (CDL - VChair)
Susan Boone (UCSF)
Tamara Guziejka (UCI - Chair)
Not attending:
Lisa Spagnolo (UCD)
Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Welcome/Assemble | Allowing people to join from other meetings, etc. | 1-2 | |||||
2 | Announcements | Share new general information. | 5 | All | ||||
3 | Topics from Slack: | Recap discussions for any follow-up or further discussion (if any). | 0 | All | No Slack activity since last meeting | |||
4 | August Release and Alma Roadmap for 2024 H2 and 2025 | Discuss features of new release and roadmap related to Acquisitions | 10 | All | ||||
5 | CDL Acquisitions distributed our first Analytics-based reports (FY-2024/2025 Campus Payments & Projections) last Thursday, August 8 | Any feedback so far? | 10 | Laura/All | ||||
6 | Request for information: OCLC Services | If possible and time-permitting, please add any additional campus-managed OCLC services to this spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zi8TZEPpCvt9Z6cgOe6pRdQAZFhHyG0N5EjFqeGpPSk/edit?gid=0#gid=0 . OCLC renewals are getting unwieldy and their invoicing system seems to be disorganized. A cheat sheet would be very helpful! | 5 | Laura | ||||
7 | Work Plan | 20 | ||||||
8 | Feedback Request for Expanded NZ Access Proposal | Please review the following two deliverables:
These deliverables are informed by the work in the following two use cases. This is optional reading. A. Use case 1: Managing Authority Control Task List; B. Use case 2: Guidelines for Cataloging and Making Accessible Open Access (OA) Monographs in the Network Zone.
For OST review, perhaps groups could set aside 10 minutes of meeting time for review of the document, in addition to discussion.
Please submit your feedback as a team at https://forms.gle/dknRf8qN2HZ7fd75A by September 6, 2024. | 10 | All | Background: In late 2023, several SILS teams (the Resource Management Operations Subteam (RM-OST), the eResources Operations Subteam (eRES-OST), and the Open Access Resource Management Project Team (OARM-PT)) came together to explore an expansion of Alma Network Zone (NZ) accounts to more staff within the UC Libraries. This need arose from the chairs’ recognition that certain Alma activities fall outside the scope of what CDL currently provides. Campus staff have the skills to do this work. However these activities can only be performed in the NZ Alma instance, and as such, campus staff need direct access to the NZ to perform this work, which they do not have. While a Network Zone Deputy process did exist, the workteam put together a proposal from February 2024 that recommended testing and expanding this process, as well as investigating common principles for NZ use and access.
Impact: Expanding access to and use of the NZ aligns with several of the SILS principles: to transform and improve work, to harmonize; to innovate and explore new ways of working; to empower data-driven and consultative decision-making; and to commit to transparency and open communication. Expanding access to the NZ enables efficiencies in systemwide work by allowing expert staff from across the UC Libraries to do work on behalf of the entire system in ways that aren’t available through the IZs.
Feedback Instructions: The final proposal for expanded NZ access and the NZ Principles will go to the Operations Team for formal vote later in the fall. In preparation for that vote, the workteam is now looking for SILS stakeholder feedback and ultimately support for this proposal.
Please discuss with your respective teams the ideas in the following DRAFT documents, and confirm whether these ideas are going in a productive direction for the SILS Service. If so, please elaborate how, and if not, then please identify necessary questions to ask, or points of weakness for the workteam to discuss. | |||
9 | Other topics | |||||||
10 | Parking Lot for Previous Action Items |